Social influence is a the effect other people have on our opinions or behaviour
Conformity is the change in our behaviour or opinions to fit in with the social norms of society or as a result of perceived group pressure.
Deutsch and Gerrard (1955) say there are two reasons as to why people conform, normative and informational social influence
Informational social influence is changing our behaviour or opinions because we think other people have superior knowledge to us.
Normative social influence is when we change our behaviour or opinions because we want to fit in and be accepted by others.
Social factors affecting conformity are group size, task difficulty and anonymity
Dispositional factors affecting conformity are personality and expertise
The study used to test for conformity was Asch
Asch's conformity study was in 1956
Asch used the Line Game to test for conformity
The aim of Asch's study was to investigate if people would conform to the opinions of others to give an answer they knew to be wrong.
Asch used a laboratory experiment with standardised procedures
Groups of 7-9 people were shown sets of 4 lines, 1 control line and 3 other comparison lines. They were asked to state out loud which comparison line was the same length as the standard line. The correct answer was always clear - the task was not ambiguous. There was only 1 real (naive) participant in each group
The other members of the group were confederates. Confederates were people who were told to act a certain way on behalf of the researcher. They were asked to give the incorrect response for 12 out of the 18 sets of lines.
Participants conformed to give the incorrect answer of the group 36.8% of the time. 76% conformed to the incorrect majority at least once. 24% of the participants resisted the pressure to conform
The results showed that people conform to fit in with a group, even when they know they are giving an incorrect judgement
Asch used 123 American male college students to participate
Obedience is when people follow the orders of an authority figure
During the Second World War, Nazi soldiers followed orders that led to the deaths of millions of Jewish people in concentration camps. Even though they knew it would be costly for the lives of so many people, they still obeyed.
Milgram's Agency Theory of obedience is a social explanation of obedience
The Agency theory is the idea that a person will obey an authority figure knowing the authority figure will take responsibility for whatever they do.
Milgram's Agency Theory (1963) suggest we are more likely to obey orders when we enter an agentic state.
An agentic state is when we believe that we are acting on behalf of an authority figure - we no longer feel accountable for our own actions
Milgram called the move from the autonomous state to an agentic state the agentic shift
Social factors affecting obedience is culture, authority and proximity
Authority is when a person is perceived to have the right to give orders
Culture is a group of people who share similar customs, belief and behaviour
Proximity is how close or near something is to us.
The dispositional factor for obedience is the authoritarian personality
Adorno made the theory of the authoritarian personality
In 1950, Adorno argued that some people form personalities that make them more obedient than other people, de to their early childhood experiences.
People with an authoritarian personality are likely to be obedient because they were raised by strict parents who used punishment as a way of controlling their children's behaviour.
Characteristics of people who have the authoritarian personality is that:
They have only black and white views - no opinions in the grey area
Only receiving conditional love
Highly critical of others
Against people who violate conventional values
They love when they are the authority figure
Immediately obeying and very submissive
Adorno developed the F scale questionnaire to measure peoples' attitudes and behaviour
Milgram's electric shock study tested for obedience