Definition - the extent to which the results of something are legitimate.
Whether the results actually represent what is out there
Internal validity - when there researcher has measured what they have intended to measure
Internal validity is good when the results are due to the manipulation of the independent variable. Therefore demand characteristics, order effects can affect internal validity
External validity - the extent to which findings an be generalised beyond the situation in which it was found.
External validity is made up of ecological, population and temporal validity
Ecological validity - is good if the results are generalisable from the setting in which they were gained to other settings
Population validity - is good if the results are generalisable to other people, other than those used
Temporal validity - is good if the results are generalisable to other times
Ways of assessing validity
Face validity
Concurrent validity
Face validity - refers to looking at whether the test, scale or measure appears 'on the face of it' to measure what it is supposed to measure.
Look at the measure and see if it is measuring what it is supposed to
Concurrent validity - this refers to looking at the results of a test and comparing them to the results of another recognised and well established test
The results of the two different tests are correlated and a significant positive correlation of at least +0.8 indicates concurrent validity
Ways of improving validity - experiments
Using a control group to compare results against
Standardising procedures (keeping everything the same) can reduce investigator effects
Single blind technique and double blind technique - reduces demand characteristics and investigator effects
Ways of improving validity - questionnaire
Using a lie scale - including a duplicate question which is rephrased to see if the participant is lying
Telling the participants that results will remain anonymous
Ways of improving validity - observations
Using a covert and natural observation which allows higher ecological validity
Clear behavioural categories
Ways of improving validity - case studies and interviews
Triangulation - the results of the interview or case study are combined with other sources of evidence like interviews from family members, personal diaries which corroborate the interview or case study data