Refers to the concept of fairness and equality in the application of the law
Oxford English Dictionary: 'the quality of being morally right and fair.' viewed aiming to achieve equality
Chaim Perelman
Only attempt to define justice and fairness is difficult
Each person will have their own idea of fairness
Subjective concept
Struggle to reach a common definition shared by all members of society
Theorists
Aristotle
Aquinas
Marx
Hart
Perelman
Jeremy Bentham
John Stuart Mill
Rawls
Nozick
Aristotle
Distributive justice (distribution of resources) and corrective justice (e.g. remedies/sentencing)
Fairlydistributing wealth: each according to his virtue and contribution in society - more benefit, the more individual does
Need proportionality, allocating according to need is unjust as it would reward the lazy as well as the hard working
Aquinas
Natural justice
Laws need to be fair and moral (backed by higher being e.g. God) to provide justice
People receive what they are due in accordance to their merit, rank and need to get what they deserve
Marx
Economic justice
Distribution of Wealth: 'from each according to his ability, to each according to his need'
Society is in a state of perpetual conflict due to competition for limited resources and therefore justice is not possible in a capitalisteconomic system. He suggests those with wealth and powersuppress/exploit the poor and powerless.
Hart
Positivist
Scientific approach which should not overlap with morality
Laws have no moral connection and they can still providejustice even when they do not follow moral principles of society
If a law is broken, it doesn't matter why, it is fair to punish the wrongdoer.
Frances Inglis
injected22 year-old son who was suffering serious head injuries from falling from an ambulance with heroin twice
attemptedmurder, and then murder
life sentence
Perelman
Distributivejustice
to each according to his merits - contribute to society - reward
to each according to his needs - welfare system means lesser legal aid elegibility
to each according to his works - incentive to better ourselves
to each equally - rations
to each according to his rank - status
to each according to his legal requirement - Thompson and Venables - change of identity
Jeremy Bentham
utilitarianism
More it increases happiness = more valuable
More it decreases happiness = more reprehensible.
One of the criticisms of utilitarianism is that the interest of an individual may be sacrificed for greater community happiness
John Stuart Mill
Utilitarianism
Quality of happiness over quantity, 'better to be a human being dissatisfied than a pig satisfied.' Justice includes respect for people, property and rights.
Punishing wrongdoers brings happiness to the greater number. But punishment itself is an evil as it involves inflicting pain or harm, and can only be justified when it gives a greaterbenefit such as public order.
Rawls
Social justice
Justice is fairness. Need a 'veil of ignorance'. No one knows his place in society, his class position or social status, nor does anyone know his fortune in the distribution of natural assets and abilities, his intelligence and strength.
Benefits and burdensdistributed fairly.Everyone should have access to the same opportunities. State must respectautonomy of the individual.
Nozick
Social Justice
Entitlement, ownership of property gives justice.Acquisition; acquiring property.Transfer; how it changes hands
Justice exists when people obtain property through legalmeans. If it is illegal, then it is injustice and must be punished.