terms - provisions of the contract which define the obligations of each parties
express terms - terms that are expressly stated within the contract and are agreed upon by the parties
implied terms - terms that are not expressly states but are assumed to exist due to context, custom or law
conditions - fundamental terms of the contract and a breach will result in contract termination
warranties - minor terms in the contract - if breached they entitle damages
innominate terms - terms that can either be conditions or warranties and depend on the severity of the breach
mere puffs - statements that are exaggerated to make one party more likely to enter into the contract
representations - pre contractualstatements that are made to induce a party into a statement
terms can help identify context and legal relationships between the parties
types of contracts - consumer to consumer - business to business - business to consumer
things within a contract - recitals - definitions - financial issues - rights and duties of the parties - exclusions and limits on liability - dispute resolution
why cases might come to court - poor drafting - ambiguity in terms - omissions from the contract - no clear articulation of meanings
puffs have no legal status and do not give rise to a legal outcome
dimock v hallett - farm described as having fertile lands this was not true but held to be a mere puff and not binding
carlill - mere puffs - smoke ball
if the statement was a term or representation depends on the intention that the statement was made with
use of the objective approach to decide if representation or term
guiding principles for representations - verification - if it was written down - importance - special knowledge- time elapsed
parole evidence rule is used with express terms
parole evidence rule - if the contract is written then there should be no difficulty in ascertaining terms
jacobs v baravia and general plantains trust - use of parole evidence rule
exceptions to parole evidence rule - no exclusivity of intention, ambiguity in interpretation, proof of custom forming in background of contract, rectification, identity of parties, proof of commencement or cessation of contract
importance of signatures in written contracts - important to show assent to the terms
when courts are asked to interpret contracts they will take the objective approach
principles for contractual interpretation - what would the reasonable person do - does the background effect the language - exclude prior negotiations - must be presumed that people do not make linguistic mistakes
why may court imply terms - construction and interpretation
implied by courts or by fact - use of the officious bystander test
requirements to imply terms - reasonable and equitable- necessary to give effect to contract - obvious that it goes without saying - capable of clear expression - not contradict express terms of the contract
implied by law often refers to - consumer rights act 2015 - sale of goods act 1979 - supply of goods and services 1982