What is a weakness of learning theory of attachment
Weakness = animal studies don't support learning theory of attachment
learning theory of attachment --> infants attach person who feeds them
BUT Lorenz's geese imprinted before they were fed, Harlows monkeys attached ---> cloth mother, regardless of milk bottle
Studies suggest attachment doesn't develop as a result of feeding
What is a weakness of learning theory of attachment
weakness = research with human infants shows feeding = not most important factor in development
-E.G Schaffer + Emerson (1964) found primary attach fig = not necessarily person who fed infant, person who interacted most, responded quickly + sensitively
Suggests LT of attach cannot explain attach in human infants
What is a weakness of the learning theory of attachment
Weakness of LT of attachment - criticised for ignoring other factors associated with development of attachment
E.g ignores importance of caregiver - infant interactions
Isabella Et Al (1989) found high levels of interactional synchrony = high quality attachment bonds
If attachment developed purely result of feeding, (as LT attachment suggests) no purpose for these complex interactions
What is a strength of learning theory of attachment
Strength - although unlikely association with food plays a role in development of attachment, conditioning may still play a part.
E.g infant may associate feeling warm + comfortable
with presence of particular adult, may influence infants choice of main attachment figure
Suggests LT of attachment may still be useful in understanding development of attachment.