Clear boundaries between public and private spaces
Less projected window sills and doorways to stop people climbing into homes
Reduce crime
Cons of Fortress Landscapes
Anti-homeless spikes highly criticised
Gated communities increasing in USA and South Africa limiting spending in local area
Sloped doorways to stop homeless people highly criticised
Less diversity, polarisation and wealth divide
Hot Springs Village and Garland county populations
Hot springs village = 16,843
Garland County = 99,784
Hot Springs Village - Pros for residents = bad for Local economy
Low taxes = good for residents = bad for local economy = increased wealth divide and decline in public services
largest gated community in US with its own, restaurants, fire department, police department, healthcare, 21 churches and 4 schools + recreational clubs like golf and pools, 13 tennis courts and 9 golf courses
Hot Springs Village vs Garland County (Crime)
47% lower crime rate than US average in Hot Springs village
However the local area of Garland County has a high violent crime rate of 29.4 when the US average is 22.7 and a high property crime rate of 74.5 when the US average is 35.4
Job decrease in Garland County
Garland county has seen the job market decrease by 4.7% and future job growth over the next ten years is predicted to be 27.2% which is lower then the US Average of 33.5%.
Average Age in Hot Springs Village vs Garland County
Average age in Hot Springs is 69 and average age in Garland County is 45
Hot Springs Village poverty rate vs Garland County
Hot springs has a poverty rate of 11.5% and Garland County has a poverty rate of 17.3%
Hot Springs Village vs Garland County average median household income
Average median household income for Hot Springs Village is $81,017
Average median household income for Garland County is $54,229