Thatcher saw the scale of state-owned companies, the removal of governmentmonopolies and the contracting out of services as key parts of her crusade to cure Britain's economic stagnation
Privatisation would cut government expenditure on loss-making industries and cut the number of civil servants by replacing them with private employees
Privatisation would also strengthen the UK economy by promoting competition and innovation
The revenue generated by the sale of state assets would also fund a reduction in tax, allowing entrepreneurs to invest more wealth in job-creating ventures
Lastly, the sales would help to create a wider ownership of shares; ordinary people would have a greater incentive to work harder, knowing that they owned a slice of the company for which they worked
While there is no doubt that Thatcher was successful in terms of the pace and extent of privitisation, historians are divided over the long-term success of this policy
Privatisation proceeded slowly at first, but then gathered speed and pace in Thatcher's second term in office
Before 1983, British Aerospace, British Sugar and British Petroleum had been sold off
Yet it was the sale of the British Telecom in 1984 and of British Gas in 1986 that really saw the launch of what Thatcher called 'popular capitalism'
Shares were sold cheaply to ensure a quick sale and wide take-up; between 1979 and 1990, the number of shareowners increased from 3 million to 11 million
However, the distribution of these shares was far more uneven than the Conservatives made out in their 1987, election manifesto
The manifesto spoke of the start of 'a profound and progressive social transformation - popular capitalism', only 9% of unskilled male workers owned any shares, compared to half of all professional males
More damaging to the long-term success of popular capitalism was the rapid sale of most shares for a quick profit to large pension or investment firms: individuals owned 38% of shares in 1975, but only 20% in 1990
By far the most successful aspect of 'popular capitalism' was the sale of council houses: over a million were sold between 1979 and 1988
The long-term impact of privitisation is disputed and it is clear that the process has had more success in certain sectors than in others
The sum of £19 billion was raised by the sale of state assets, Harold Macmillan compared this to 'selling off the family silver'
This money made from the sale of state assets was used to pay for tax cuts
While competition has driven innovation and better customer service in telecoms
Privatisation of British Rail between 1994 and 1997 led to a highly confused situation where the government continued to subsidise private firms that operate the trains; government spending on trains has doubled since 1994 while most commuters would agree that the service has not improved
The launch of the Private Finance Initiative under Thatcher's successor, JohnMajor in 1992 led to an increase in privatisation after Thatcher's departure in 1990
Public-private partnerships were designed to inject private funding and expertise into traditionally state-run concerns such as hospitals and schools
While the iniative led to the construction of some impressive buildings, it became clear that by 1997, the future generation of taxpayers would have to pay a huge amount of money to the private firms who put in the initial investment