NICE review - when compared with antipsychotics medication alone, CBTp was effective in reducing rehospitalisation rates up to 18 months following the end of treatment
CBTp was also shown to be effective in reducing symptom severity and there was some evidence for improvements in social functioning
However, most of the studies in effectiveness of CBTp have been conducted with patients treated at the same time with antipsychotic medication - therefore difficult to assess effectiveness of CBTp independent of antipsychotic medication
CBTpAO3 - Effectiveness dependent on the stage
CBTp appears to be more effective when it is made available at specific stages of the disorder and when the delivery of the treatment is adjusted to the stage that the individual is currently at
Addington and Addington - claim that in the initial acute phase of SZ self-reflection is not particular appropriating
Following stabilisation of the psychotic symptoms with antipsychotic medication individuals can benefit more from group based CBTp
This can help normalise their experience by meeting other individuals with similar issues
CBTpAO3 - Benefits overstated
Jauhar et al - recent large scalemeta analysis revealed only a small therapeutic effect on the key symptoms of SZ such as hallucinations and delusions
Even these small effects disappeared when symptoms were assessed ‘blind’
Many studies seem to have similar design problems and in their meta-analysis the uncertainty over whether non-drug therapies such as CBTp really do offer superior outcomes to antipsychotic medication has led to conflicting recommendations even within the UK (Taylor and Perera)
Despite the high costs of family therapy, many argue it can reduce the 'revolving door syndrome'
Anderson et al - found a relapse rate of almost 40% when patients had drugs only, compared to only 20% when FT was used and the relapse rate was less than 5% when both were used together with the medication
With a drastically reduced relapse rate with FT, will reduce the amount of times patients are hospitalised and therefore reduce the cost to the NHS, and therefore the economy
Family TherapyAO3 - Less effective by itself
Family therapy seems to be most effective when used in conjunction with powerful antipsychotics to treat SZ
Vaughn and Leff looked at schizophrenic patients returning to either a high or low EE family
The effect of no medication on low EE was insignificant
In the high EE household, relapse of SZ symptoms increased with more face-to face contact, and with no medication relapse rate rose to 92%
This implies that focusing on both family dynamics and biochemistry is best for patients with schizophrenia and their families.
Family TherapyAO3 - Evidence of effectiveness
Leff - programme that involved educational sessions dealing with the nature of SZ, group meetings between families and family sessions
Found that families involved in the intervention showed a significant decrease in critical comments directed towards the patient and reduced over-involvement (EE)
78% of patients in control group were readmitted to hospital compared to only 14% of the experimental group with schizophrenia
This implies that family intervention made a significant difference to the interactions within the families