Diathesis-Stress ModelAO3 - Real world application
Tarrier et al - patients allocated to one of three conditions, where the last control group received no treatment and the first two groups received a combination of psychological and biological treatments
After an 18 month follow-up, "there were significant advantages for CBT and supportive counseling over TAU alone on symptom measures, no group difference was seen for relapse or re-hospitalisation”
Adjunctive psychological treatments can have a beneficial long-term effect on symptom reduction
Diathesis-Stress ModelAO3 - Over-simplistic
Most diathesis-stress models emphasise ‘vulnerability’ in terms of genetic influences alone
Ex. Ripke et al - over 108 candidate genes, each slightly increasing the risk of SZ, and so there is no single 'schizogene'
Stress can come in many forms apart from the schizophrenogenic mother or dysfunctional parenting - high levels of expressed emotion, childhood trauma (Read et al) and the excessive use of cannabis (Houston et al)
Therefore, the diathesis is not exclusively biological, nor is the stressor exclusively psychological.
Diathesis-Stress ModelAO3 - Support for vulnerability
Tienari et al - used research from mothers and adoptees who suffered from SZ and compared these findings to a neurotypical group adopted across the same period
Adoptive parents - high levels of critics, hostility and low levels of empathy were strongly associated with the development of SZ but only in the genetic risk group
Therefore, this provides strong support for the diathesis-stress model because the findings demonstrate that a single diathesis is not enough to trigger the development of SZ