Rutter (2011) investigated long term effects of early institutionalisation and deprivation on childrens development
165 romanian orphans adopted into Uk families, who experienced very poor conditions in orphanage
compared with CG of 52 british children adopted around same time
longitudinal study assessing children at 4, 6, 11, 15, 21 years- measured physical, cog, emotionaldevelopment using interviews, observations and standardised tests
compared outcomes based age of adoption- before 6 months, between 6 months and 2 years, after 2 years
findings:
half orphans had delayed intellectual development- low IQ/MR when came to UK
adopted before 6 months- mean IQ 102, normal development compared to CG, few signs of attachment issues
adopted after 2 years -more likely to show disinhibited attachment, IQ 77
strength- naturally occurring experiment
allows researchers to study effects of extreme deprivation in real-life settings
e.g. children already experienced institutional care so no variables manipulated, avoids ethical issues of deliberately subjecting children to deprivation
enhances eco validity of findings as reflect real world conditions instead of artificial lab ones
increases generalisability + gives valuable insight into effects of institutionalisation
strength-practical applications
led to improved care of children in institutional settings e.g. findings showed that those adopted before 6 months had better developmental outcomes
this used to encourage quicker placements with foster families, reducing time spent in orphanages
research has influenced care policy/practices, emphasising the need for better care+ importance of early attachments
improves lives of orphanage systems world wide
weakness- SSR
study found children who spent longer period in orphanages showed more developmental delays and attachment issues
could reinforce neg perceptions of institutional care and stereotypes that they are inadequate beings
this could influence public policy and opinion, suggesting that those who experienced institutional care are incapable of rs of functioning adequately like getting jobs etc
leads to unrealistic views and causes harm to individuals
weakness- lack of data on adult development
its too soon to determine whether the effects the children suffered are actually long lasting as the data only goes up to their 20s
suggests its possible that those adopted before 6 months may not be able to maintain romantic and parenting rs or maybe adopted after 2 years can have secure attachments with kids etc
lack of clarity on findings makes theory incomplete
findings
differences continued to be apparent at age of 16 (beckett2010)
frequency of disinhibitedattachment relates to age of adoption- after 6 months were clingy, attention seekers, indiscriminate affection to strangers but rare in those before 6 months
supports bowlby 'sensitive period' in developing attachment + failure has long term effects