Save
RS YEAR 13
meta-ethics
Naturalism
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Share
Learn
Created by
lola renae
Visit profile
Cards (51)
what is naturalism?
the idea that
moral values
can be correctly discovered by
observation
of the
natural world
what is "right" and "wrong" can be established by...?
looking at the world around us (
empirical observation
)
what kind of theory is naturalism?
a
moral realist
theory (moral facts/ truths actually
exist
)
in essence, what is naturalism grounded in?
the facts of
nature
, or in the facts of
human nature
what else is naturalism?
cognitivist
how is naturalism cognitivist?
statements about
morality
are either
objectively
true
or
false
what do
naturalist
theories
often talk of?
intrinsic
good
what does intrinsic good mean?
the
value
that something has "
in itself
" and holding that this
good
is
self-evident
what is an example of theological naturalism?
Aquinas' NML
how is Aquinas' NML an example of theological naturalism?
it is based on the idea that the world has a
God-given
order
so moral values can be worked out by...?
understanding our
God-given
purpose
and
observing
the
natural order
meta-ethically, what will an ethical naturalist argue is vitally important?
to hold that there are
ethical facts
about the
world
why would an ethical naturalist argue it is vitally important to hold that there are ethical facts about the world?
because otherwise we have no
real justification
for our
actions
how can we discover goodness/ morality/ moral truths?
by
observing
the
natural world
around us
what did F.H Bradley argue?
that it is possible to understand our
moral duties
by
observing
our
position
or
station
in
life
finish F.H Bradley's quote, "what he has to do depends on what his place is, what his function is...?
and that all comes from his station in the organism
"
what does F.H Bradley mean in this quote?
that through
observation
, we can understand
moral values
/
absolutes
(s) what is one obvious strength of ethical naturalism?
that
ethical propositions
are
true
because they're
factual
(s) what do they reduce to?
non-ethical properties
about the
world
, such as
happiness
,
love
,
well-being
etc
(s) what are these facts grounded in?
human nature
(s) what does naturalism make morality/ right and wrong?
objective
, rather than
subjective
(s) they exist in the world outside ourselves, if there is an objective moral reality then...?
we can
know
if we are doing
right
or
wrong
(s) as well, if morality is objective...?
then it's
universal
(s) what does this give morality?
importance
, rather than just being a matter of
personal opinion
(s) what can ethical propositions give us?
solid
guidelines
and
rules
to follow (a set of
absolutes
)
(s) what does naturalism fit with?
widely used
normative ethical theories
(e.g.
NML
)
(s) therefore...?
it is a
popular
approach to understanding
morality
, that has
real-world
relevance
(w) the claim that ethical propositions are factual doesn't impress who?
ethical non-cognitivists
(who argue that moral propositions aren't
factual
)
(w) briefly, we can see the non-cognitivist approach from who?
A.J Ayer
(w) what is Ayer's ethical non-cognitivism approach called?
emotivism
(w) for Ayer, what do moral statements reduce to?
statements of
approval
or
disapproval
(w) for emotivists and others, what is morality?
subjective
, not
objective
(w) who identifies the naturalistic fallacy as the key error that naturalism makes?
G.E Moore
(w) what does Moore say is a mistake?
to try and
define
the concept "
good
" in terms of some
natural property
such as "
pleasant
" or "
desirable
"
(w) just because something is natural...?
we shouldn't
assume
that it is
good
(w) what did Moore also argue?
that it isnt possible to derive an "
ought
" from an "
is
"
(w) we cannot go from pleasure IS good to...?
we ought to seek pleasure
(w) what is another way of saying this?
we cannot derive moral values from facts
(w) for example...?
she
IS
old and lonely (
fact
) and you
OUGHT
to help her (
moral value
)
(w) why is deriving you ought to help her from she is old and lonely logically invalid?
something is
missing
in the
reasoning
between them
See all 51 cards