Part 1: Group & Team Dynamics (finishing L20)

    Cards (12)

    • Social Loafing
      • Reduced individual effort when performing as part of a group 
      • Explains motivational losses 
      • Social loafing occurs when: 
      • Identifiability of individual performances is lost within a group performance 
      • Diffusion of responsibility & lack of accountability 
      • Can also occur when task is not perceived to be important 
      • Team doesn’t know each other well
      • Persons contribution to outcome is redundant
      • Perceive team-mates are of higher ability
    • Social Loafing
      • Reduced individual effort when performing as part of a group 
      • So…
      • Monitoring individual performances can decrease social loafing 
      • Social Incentives - increases individual effort 
      • Peer pressure from teammates, praise/recognition, social approval, social support 
    • Social Loafing
      • Reduced individual effort when performing as part of a group 
      • Explains motivational losses 
      • Bigger team harder to work together
      • Or due to withdrawing effort 
      • Showed majority of faulty due to withdrawing effort (psych of coordination problem)
      • Phenomena is known as social loafing 
      • Explains if why these motivational losses occur
    • Social Loafing occurs when: 
      • Identifiability of individual performances is lost within a group performance 
      • Diffusion of responsibility & lack of accountability 
      • Can also occur when task is not perceived to be important
      • Outcome doesn’t matter 
      • Team doesn’t know each other well
      • Not connected, or have respect for them 
      • Persons contribution to outcome is redundant
      • When individual role in team, believe doesn't have impact in overall performance - team will still play well without me 
      • Perceive team-mates are of higher ability
      • Let them take responsibility
    • Social Loafing
      • Social loafing occurs when: 
      • Identifiability of individual performances is lost within a group performance 
      • Explain why motivational losses happen 
      • Results in decrease in performance 
      • Key aspect to improve to help reduce faulty processes so team can perform better
    • Social Loafing
      • Reduced individual effort when performing as part of a group 
      • So…
      • Monitoring individual performances can decrease social loafing 
      • + team performance 
      • Increases accountability
      • Think individual performance is important for team performance
      • More motivated for your mistakes not to be recorded - for me to be accountable
      • Also if it is being recorded
      • Own personal goals (so you do well as well as just your team)
      • Also decreases social loafing
      • Something you can identify, to identify that your performance was good in that team performance
    • Social Loafing
      • So…
      • Social Incentives - increases individual effort 
      • Peer pressure from team-mates, praise/recognition, social approval, social support 
      • To feel more connected to teammates
      • Positive reinforcement to help you perform well 
      • Also decrease social loafing 
      • Social support within the team 
      • Social loafing can occur when others are taking up slack then when won't put in that effort 
      • If increase social support, increase trust in teammates (to perform well + support) - social loafing should decrease
      • So feel motivated to perform at your best
    • Social Loafing - Everett et al. (1992) Swim Study - 2 trials
      • Trial 1: Individual lap times were announced (high identifiability) → Individuals swam faster in relays than in individual races 
      • Trial 2: Individual lap times NOT announced (low identifiability) → Individuals swam faster in individual races than in relays 
      • 1 way to overcoming social loafing is to increase identifiability 
      • To make performances accountable
    • Social Loafing - Everett et al. (1992) Swim Study - 2 trials
      • Trial 1: Individual lap times were announced (high identifiability) → Individuals swam faster in relays than in individual races 
      • Also each time within a relay 
      • All teammates know what my performance was
      • Positive motivational factor to reduce motivational losses/social loafing
      • Trial 2: Individual lap times NOT announced (low identifiability) → Individuals swam faster in individual races than in relays 
      • Don't know individual or individual time within a relay
    • Practical Implications
      • Individual skill performance shouldn’t be the only factor in team selection 
      • Need to establish specific team & individual goals
      • Need to give performance feedback & reinforcement for team & individual goals
      • Need to give individual recognition - emphasise individuals specific role in team effort (without creating ego oriented motivational climate)
    • Practical Implications
      • Individual skill performance shouldn’t be the only factor in team selection 
      • Want team to coordinate & work together (communicate well to achieve team goal & objectives)
      • Need to establish specific team & individual goals
      • So that are motivated to work for team but also yourself 
      • Need to give performance feedback & reinforcement for team & individual goals
      • Establish accountability 
      • For your improvement not just team feedback
    • Practical Implications
      • Need to give individual recognition - emphasise individuals specific role in team effort (without creating ego oriented motivational climate)
      • Each individual role in team, in team effort 
      • Why are important for team 
      • Without goal/ego orientation but more task motivation 
      • Not competitive environment against other team members
    See similar decks