What is being observed is merely hand movements of changes in expression
Cannot be certain that the infants were actually engaging in interactional synchrony or reciprocity
Piaget - true imitation (interactional synchrony) is developed at the end of the first year and anything before this was response training (infant repeating behaviour that was rewarded as a results of operant conditioning). Piaget believed that infants behaviour was pseudo imitation - the infant had not consciously translated what they see into a matching movement
C-I Interactions AO3 - Fine detail
Controlled observations often capture fine details, with both the mother and infant being filmed, often from multiple angles
This ensures that fine details of behaviour can be recorded and later analysed
Babies are unaware that they are being observed so their behaviour does not change in response to controlled observations which is generally a problem for observational research
This is a strength because it means that the research has high internal validity as it is measuring what it is intending to measure
C-I InteractionsAO3 - Not found in all cultures
Le Vine et al reported that Kenyan mothers have little physical interactions or physical contact with their infants but such infants have high proportions of secure attachments
This means that the research may be ethnocentric and therefore cannot be generalised to a wider population