different researchers are interested in different research questions
some psychologists interested in understanding role of the fathers as a secondary attachment figure, others are interested in fathers as a primary attachment figure
secondary - finds father behaving differently from mothers and having a distinct role
primary - finds fathers can take on a maternal role
this means that the role of the father become unclear because of contradicting evidence on primary and secondary attachment figure fathers
Role of FatherAO3 - Conflicting evidence
Grossman research suggests that fathers as a secondary attachment figure had an important and distinct role in children’s development which suggests that children growing up in single mother/lesbian parent families would turn out different from those in two heterosexual families
However MacCallum and Golombokconsistently found that children growing up in single or same sex families do not develop differently from those in heterosexual families
This means that fathers as secondary attachment figures is not important
Role of Father AO3 - Biased research
Preconceptions about how fathers should be or behave are based by stereotypical accounts and images of parenting roles
Fathers do not become primary attachment figures because of traditionalgender roles - women are expected to be more caring and nurturing than men which may cause observer bias whereby observers mostly focus on the mother as that is what they are expected to see
Oestrogen creates higher levels of nurturing therefore they are biologically predisposed to being the primary attachment figure which puts men at a biological disadvantage