Monotropic Theory AO3 - Concept of monotropy lacks validity
Schaffer and Emerson found that although babies have one specific attachment first, they also develop multiple attachments
Although first attachment does have a strong influence on behaviour, it may just mean it is stronger - not necessarily different in quality from other attachments (ex. other attachments to family members provide all same key qualities)
This means that Bowlby may be incorrect that there is a unique quality and importance to the child’s primary attachment
Monotropic Theory AO3 - Support for social releasers
Brazelton et al observed babies trigger interactions with adults using social releasers
Researchers then instructed the babies’ primary attachment figure to ignore the social releasers - to which the babies become increasingly distressed
This illustrates the role of social releasers in emotional development and suggests that they are important int eh process of attachment development
Monotropic Theory AO3 - Support for internal working models
Bailey et al assessed att. relationships in mothers and their babies + mothers att. to their own primary att. figures
Found that mothers with poor att. to their own primary att. figures were more likely to have poorly att. babies
However there are other important influences on social development
Kornienko - genetic differences in anxiety and sociality affect social behaviour in both babies and adults
This means that Bowlby may have overestimated the importance of the IWM