To see if ppts would conform to an obviously incorrect majority (ppts told it was a study on perception)
What was the pilot study for Aschks line study?
36ppts judged 20 line tasks. 717/720 were obvious. These were used in his line study (valid). This was important to ensure the answer to the questions was obvious.
what was the procedure for Asch’s line study?
1ppts sat around the table with 6 Confederates(actors)
The participant would always be last to answer
ppts had to match a target line with another (A, B or C), answers given out loud, 6 Confederates first then ppt
They did this 18 times - first, the Confederates gave the correct answer(first 6 questions), then the remaining 12 questions they answered incorrectly
Results of Asch’s line study
37% conformity rate
75% conformed at least once
25% never conformed
Groups size variation of this study
The bigger the groups size, the higher the conformity rate:
2 Confederates = 41%
3 Confederates = 32%
4+ Confederates = 37%
Normative social influence - pressure to fit in
What is the unanimous position variation of this study?
Same as the original except:
one confederate gave the other incorrect answer = 91% conformity rate
One confederate gave the correct answer = 5% conformity rate
= pressure broken so ppt free to give their own answer as your not the only different one.
What is the task difficulty variation of this study?
The harder the task, the higher the conformity rate.
= informational social influence - we have a need to be right
Can the variations be AO1 for ‘variations essay’ and AO3 for ‘Asch essay’ ?
Yes
One strength of Asch’s line study (Lucas)
asked ppts to solve easy and hard maths questions but were given ‘other students’ answers if they wanted to use them
Ppts conformed to ‘other students’ answers on hard questions
Backs up task difficulty variation (informational social influence)
One strength of Asch’s line study? (Pilot study)
Pilot study conduct- if was testing an obvious incorrect majority
One weakness of Asch’s line study (ethics)
Deception- ppts told study was on perception but was on conformity. However, the benefits outweighed the cost as it was necessary to obtain natural conformity behaviour
Informed consent- Not given as deception used, But needed
Protection from harm - ppts may have felt great pressure and could have felt embarrassed. However this was no greater discomfort than everyday life and was needed for natural behaviour
One weakness of Asch’s line study (methodological problems)
Demand characteristics - some ppts may have worked out the aim and just gone along with the study. Confederates were not always convincing
Gender bias- only males used, shouldn't be generalised to females (beta bias). Female conformity is actually higher due to being more concerned socially
Cultural bias - only Americans used (individualistic), cannot be generalised to eastern cultures (beta bias)