Save
...
legal system
tribunals and ADR
alternative dispute resolution (ADR)
Save
Share
Learn
Content
Leaderboard
Share
Learn
Created by
reeya
Visit profile
Cards (28)
parties
don't have to take their
cases
to civil courts
benefits
resolved in
private
parties
involved in the
decision making
much
quicker
less
expensive
4 different
ADR
methods
arbitration
conciliation
mediation
negotiation
arbitration
most
formal
parties
agree to have their
dispute
decided by an independent arbitrator
businesses
and
trade unions
use this
arbitration
-
Scott v Avery clause
a part in the contract
business may opt to use it in their contracts
parties signing the contract are agreeing that if a
dispute
should arise in the
future
they will use arbitration
arbitration
- the
hearing
set for a time and date that's mutually convenient for both
parties
formal or informal as parties decide
parties may opt for hearing where
documents
are submitted followed by a short hearing
paper
arbitration
conducted where parties submit their dispute in writing to the arbitrator who will decide who to grant the
award
(a decision)
most formal
arbitration
involves
lawyers
and witnesses attending hearing in a similar way to a
court case
the
arbitrator
=
judge
parties free to choose who the arbitrator will be
sometimes a lawyer or an expert in
particular
cases
choose a single arbitrator or
panel
institute of arbitrators
provide skilled arbitrators whom the parties may choose to employ if they can't agree
arbitration - the
award
decision is effective immediately
binding legally
may be a delay if arbitrator misinterpreted/ misapplied a law
queen's bench divisional court can challenge the award on a point of law
conciliation
less formal
conciliator
play a more active role in trying to solve dispute
conciliator
neutral third party
actively try to get parties in the dispute to come to an agreement
often meets with parties
separately
+ suggest solutions
try get parties to compromise or reach a
settlement
no authority to see evidence or call witnesses
decision not binding - conciliation
unless agreed by parties that it will be legally enforceable
court - conciliation
parties still go to court if an agreement/compromise is not agreed by the parties
parties - concilliation
full control if the process
allowed to withdraw at any point
decide time and place that is convenient
non-binding opinion - conciliation
conciliate offers to parties
how they should settle the dispute
benefits
of
conciliation
useful in
disputes
between companies
use conciliation to assess strength of
case
before deciding to take it to
court
mediation
independent
third party
meets with the parties in the dispute
try get them to reach a settlement
mediator
won't make suggestions
they facilitate (assist) parties to make the decision for themselves
doesn't offer an opinion unless asked
mediator role
consult each party
explore needs of each party
keep
confidentiality
make sure an
agreement
is reached between parties
mediation - parties
control over the resolution process
pick their own time and place
may withdraw at any time
must agree to the compromise for mediation work
choosing
method of mediation
parties
may choose
mediation
-
family disputes
mediators
often training in counselling skills
family law act 1996
encourages divorcing couples to use mediation
negotiation
least
formal
takes place between the
parties
themselves
private
, quick and cheapest
face to face, emails, telephone
negotiation
deals with
neighbouring
pr
family
disputes
parties
-
negotiation
initially try to negotiate a
settlement
before further action is taken
parties talking to each other
solicitors
-
negotiations
negotiations between solicitors of the the parties in the run of to a civil
trial
continue once a
claim
has been made and the parties are awaiting for their trial date