rules of language

Cards (13)

  • What are the rules of language? What are they used for?
    instructions for how to read words depending how the sentence has been constructed
  • What are the 3 rules of language?
    • Ejusdem generis
    • Expressio unius est exclusio alterius
    • Noscitur a sociis
  • What is the ejusdem generis rule?
    In a list of specific items, any general terms that follow the list shall be taken as meaning things of the same kind (if a list has "and other" its probs this rule)
  • give the case example for ejusdem generis
    powell v kempton park racecourse co 1899
  • explain this case
    • the betting act 1853 prohibited a "house, office, room or other place" for betting (suggesting indoor location)
    • defendant had betting outside
    • decided this wasn't within term of "other places" so was not guilty
  • What is the expressio unius exclusio alterius rule?
    where there is a list of words NOT followed by general words (act only applies to items in the list)
  • what are the case examples for this rule?
    • Sedgley inhabitants 1832
    • Tempest v Kilner 1846
  • explain sedgley inhabitants
    • taxes imposed on occupiers of "land, houses & coal mines"
    • held that this didn't include any other types of mines
  • explain Tempest v Kilner 1846
    • phrase "goods, wares and merchandise" didn't include stocks & shares
  • What is the Noscitur A Sociis rule?
    words must be looked at in context which involves looking at other words in the same sections OR other sections of the act to draw its overall meaning
  • what are the case examples for this rule?
    • R v Harris 1836
    • Muir v Keay 1875
  • explain R v Harris
    • D charged with "stabbed, cut or wounded another" which implied use of a weapon
    • D bit off friend's nose with her teeth
    • Courts said teeth weren't a weapon so D not guilty
  • explain Muir v keay
    • statute dealt w/ licenses for "public refreshment, resort & entertainment"
    • D said he wasn't providing entertainment in his cafe so didn't need license
    • court said entertainment didn't just mean "musical" but also "reception & accommodation of people"