the variable the researcher changes or manipulates
what is the dependent variable
the variable the researcher records and mesaures the effect of this change
why should all other variables (extraneous variables stay the same)
so the researcher can be confident that the cause of the effect on the dv was the IV alone and not any other variable
operationalising variables
how you will change / measure the variables
how can an investigation be further operationalised
more details of the investigation are given , such as the number of questions on the test
what is a directional hypothesis
states the direction the relationship that will be shown between the variables
examples of directional hypothesis
Boys will use more swear words then girls
what is a non directional hypothesis
two tailed hypothesis which simply states that there is a difference between the conditions or different groups of people but does not state the difference
example of a non directional hypothesis
there is a difference in the amount of swear words used by boys and girls
a null hypothesis
states that there is no difference between the conditions or groups of people
aim
the purpose of the study
hypothesis
a testable statement
extraneous variable
any other variable which is not the IV that effects the DV but doesnt vary systematically with the IV
examples of extraneous variable
lighting in a lab, age of participants
how do extraneous variables effect the investigation
harder to detect the cause and effect
cofounding variables
same as extraneous variable however it does vary systematically with the IV
examples of cofounding variables
time of day e.g in a sleep study the people who did the test later may be more tired and therefore do worse
4 types of extraneous variables
situational variables
participant variables
investigator effects
demand characteristics
what is situational variables
aspects of the environment that effect a participants behaviour e.g noise , lighting conditions
participant variables
ways in which participants vary from each other e.g mood , intelligence
demand characteristics
any cue the researcher may give which makes the participant feel like they can guess the aim of the investigation
what do demand characteristics cause
participants can act differently e.g please u and screw u effect
investigator effects
are the ways in which researchers unconsciously influence the results of research
examples of investigator effects
biased in their interpretation of the data and find what they expect to find
less obvious personal characteristics of invesitigators like accent and tone
the design of the study
ways of dealing with extraneous variables
single blind design
double blind design
experimental realism
what is experimental realism
if the researcher makes the task sufficiently engaging the participant will pay attention to the task and not the fact that they are being observed
how to overcome investigator effects
standardisation- instructions written in a particular way e.g a format in which they can be read out and a check at the end so participants know what they have to do
validity
the extent to which a study measures what it intends to measure
internal validity
whether the effects observed in the experiment are due to the manipulation of the IV and no other variable
mundane realism
how realistic the task is , do you get asked to do this in everyday life
external validity
how well you can generalise from the research participants to people , places and times outside the study
ecological validity
how well you can generalise the study to different settings and environments
population validity
how well the sample used can be generalised to the population as a whole
temporal validity
how valid the conclusions of the study over time
pilot studies
small scale investigations to indetify potential problems with the design or method
examples where pilot studies are useful
participants may not understand the question , bored if there are too many tasks or questions
confederates
another person to play a role in an experiment
repeated measures design
the same participants take part in all conditions of the IV
advantages of repeated measures
eliminates participant variables
fewerparticipants needed so less time consuming trying to find