Therapist teaches relaxationtechniques (must teach people how to calm themselves)
Goal is extinction of phobia
Immediate exposure to phobic stimulus (either in vivo or in VR)
2-3 hours (fear response limited to 20 mins) + prevention of escape unless entirely necessary (decided upon by therapist)
Once initial feardissipates -> relaxation techniques employed
New stimulus-response link learned = mastery of fear
Flooding A&E point 1: it is effective and cost-effective
Ougrin (2011)
Equallyeffective to other therapies, e.g. cognitive therapies
Much quicker process
Therefore it is cheaper + more accessible
Choy et al. (2007)
Flooding more effective than SD
Flooding A&E point 2: ethical issues -> it is highly traumatic
Vital that fullyinformedconsent is achieved
Inability to leave = considerable problem
Frequent drop-outs = wasted money + skews results of studies into effectiveness
If not completed it could reinforce the phobia!!
SD and flooding A& point 1: could be treating the symptoms not the cause
Largely believed by non-behavioural psychologists that 'symptomsubstitution' may be an issue
Possible reason for this -> anxiety = displaced + has other underlying cause (one phobia is seemingly 'cured' but another one develops shortly after)
Not effective treatment if true as therefore another phobia/disorder willarise
SD and flooding A&E point 2: suggestion that psychodynamic + biological approaches would be more appropriate
Psychodynamic approach -> LittleHans!! (supported by a case of Wolpe's in which a woman with a phobia of spiders was cured by 'talking through' marital problems rather than SD because her husband would call her a bug/insect/spider + the fear became displaced onto real spiders)
Biological approach -> Aouizerate et al. (2004) = SSRIs improve anxiety in 50-80% of social phobias