ability to take info, store it and then recall it at a later time
memory is broken into three stages: encoding, storage and retrieval
semantic - meaning
acoustic- sound
coding is how the information is processed to get into the store
capacity is how much info the store can hold
duration is how long info can be stored for
we encode info into the sensory register from the five senses
we encode info into STMacoustically
we encode info to LTM semantically
research done on coding in STM
Baddeley (1966) gave participants 6 letter sequences to remember
when recall was immediate the letters that didnt sound the same were remembered best
shows STM uses acoustic coding as similar SOUND letters were hard to different
research done on coding in LTM
Baddeley gave participants a list of semanticallysimilar words or disimilar
waited 20 mins before recall
recall was best for disimlar
LTM uses semantic as words were muddled due to similar meaning
strength of researxh into coding
well controlled
all participants received exactly th same instructions and procedure
easy to replicate to test on reliability
important features of science which makes it scientific
weakness of research into coding
ecological validity: includew random words
stimuli faced with on a daily basis may be coded in diff ways
findings don’t apply to wider contexts
research done on capacity of STM
miller (1956) concluded capacity of STM is 5-9 items
meaning we can hold that amount of items before they are forgotten
research on chunking
miller suggested can improve STM through chunking
grouping info to make it meaningful
research about digit span
miller research supported by jacob’s (1887)
serial digit span technique used where ppts were given one letter or number to recall. if gotten right on recall they were five two and so on until a mistake
9.3 digits remembered
7.3 letters remembered
supports idea STM holds only 5-9 items
strengths of research into capacity of STM
high degree of control
reliable
weaknesses on reseatch into capacity of STM
low temporal validity
low ecological validity
a trigram is a random 3 letter sequence
duration of the sensory register:
iconic store: 0.5 seconds
echoic store: 4.2 seconds
duration of the STM:
peterson and peterson (1969)
participants given trigrams to recall after eithr 3,6,9,12,15 or 18 seconds
3 sec- 80% recall
6sec- 50% recall
18sec- less than 10%
duration of STM not much longer than 18 seconds
evaluation of research into duration of STM:
high control
reliable
low ecological validity
research into duration of LTM:
Bahrick et al (1975)
investigated memory of schl friends
392 US ex high school students given 4 tests -free recall of names, photo recognition, name recognitio, name and photo matching
recognition easier than recall, test 3 showed accuracy
90% accuracy in face recognition after 15 yrs
evaluation of research into duration of LTM
lack ecological validity
can’t generalise data
poor control
factors affecting duration of STM
rehearsal: involves going over info in some way, 2 main types: maintenance rehearsal- repeating info, elaborative rehearsal- making info meaningful
knowing you have to recall: if you don’t realise you will be tested duration tends to be shorter
factors affecting duration of LTM
type of material: Conway et al (1991) found that some areas of a psych course were better remembered over time due to learning of skills
depth of learning: duration is longer for info you learn well to begin with