commentators argue that there are many factors that may change a woman's menstrual cycle and act as confounding variables in research (e.g. stress, diet). so any pattern of synchronisation (e.g. in stern and mcclintock's study) is what we would expect to occur by chance. also, research involves small samples of women and relies of them self-reporting onset of their own cycle (may be inaccurate). this suggests important aspects of synchronisation studies may lack validity.