Questionnaires are probably the most common type of self-report technique. They involve a pre-set list of written questions to which a particular participant responds
Psychologists use questionnaires to assess thoughts and/or feelings. A questionnaire may be used as part of an experiment to assess the dependent variable
An open question does not have a fixed range of answers and respondents are free to answer in any way they wish. Open questions tend to produce qualitative data that contains a wide range of different responses but may be difficult to analyse
A closed question offers a fixed number of responses. Closed questions tend to produce quantitative data. Quantitative data is usually easy to analyse but it may lack the depth and detail associated with open questions
There are three types of closed questions:
Likert scale
Rating scale
Fixed-choice option
A likert scale is one in which the respondent indicate their agreement with a statement using a scale of usually fivepoints. The scale ranges from Strongly agree to Strongly disagree
A rating scale works in a similar way but gets respondents to identify a value that represents their strength of feeling about a particulartopic
A fixed-choice option item includes a list of possible options and respondents are required to indicate those that apply to them
Some interviews may be conducted over the phone/internet, most involve a face-to-face interaction between an interviewer and an interviewee
There are three broad types of interviews:
Structured interviews
Unstructured interviews
Semi-structured interviews
Structured interviews are made up of a pre-determined set of questions that are asked in a fixed order. Basically this is like a questionnaire but conducted face-to-face in real time
Unstructured interviews work a lot like a conversation as there are noset questions. There is a general aim that a certain topic will be discussed, and interaction tends to be free-flowing. The interviewee is encouraged to expand and elaborate their answers as prompted by the interviewer
Semi-structured interviews: the sort of interview one is most likely to encounter in everyday life. e.g. a job interview. There is a list of questions that have been worked out in advance but interviewers are also free to ask follow up questions based on previous answers
Most interviews involve an interview schedule, which is the list of questions that the interviewer intends to cover
This should be standardised to reduce the contaminating effect of interviewer bias
Typically, the interviewer will take notes throughout the interviewer, or alternatively, the interviewer may be recorded and analysed later
Interviews usually involve an interviewer and a single participant, though group interviews may be appropiate especially in clinicalsettings
In the case of one-to-one interview, the interviewer should conduct the interview in a quiet room, away from other people, as this will increase the likelihood that the interviewee will open-up
It is good practice to begin the interview with some neutral questions to make the interviewee feel relaxed and comfortable, and as a way of establishing rapport
Of course, the interviewees should be reminded on several occasions that their answers will be treated in the strictest confidence
This is especially important if the interview includes topics that may be personal or sensitive
Standardisation of questions within an interview is one way of controlling for the possible effects of bias
However, this may not remove bias entirely
This is especially true if the interview is unstructured because the interviewer controls the way the discussiondevelops, and the lines of enquiry followed
Forms of bias in psychological research & the steps taken to minimise these
Extraneous and confounding variables - standardised procedures, controlled laboratory environment
sample bias - random sampling, stratified sampling
Before the study begins, questionnaire and interview questions should always be piloted
How a pilot study of a questionnaire/interview would be carried out:
The interview/questionnaire would be conducted with a small group of participants to determine if all the questions were clear, unambiguous, ethical and understandable
What would be gained from conducting the pilot study and what the researcher might do as a result:
Any questions that did not meet this criticism would be rewritten perhaps as a result of suggestions from the participants involved in the pilot
Clarity is essential when designing questionnaires and interviews
If respondents are confused by or misinterpret questions, this will have a negativeimpact on the quality of the information received
Avoid:
overuse of jargon
emotivelanguage and leading questions
double-barrelled questions and doublenegatives
in question designs
Jargon refers to the technical terms that are only familiar to those within a specialisedfield or area
Sometimes, a researcher's attitude towards a particulartopic is clear from the way in which the question is phrased
A double-barrelled question contains twoquestions in one, the issue being that respondents may agree with onehalf of the question and nottheother
Designing a self-report study:
aimsandhypothesis
decide items for yourquestionnaire
pilot the questionnaire
sampling
consider ethical issues
analysisofdata
Advantages of questionnaires:
Cost effecttive
Gather large amounts of data quickly
Lackof effort needed by researcher
Data is straightforward to analyse (easier in fixed-choice Q's)
Statistical analysis
Comparison between groups of people can be made using graphs/charts
Research doesn't have to be present, e.g. postal questionnaire
Disadvantages of questionnaires:
Given responses may not always be truthful
Respondents may want to present themselves in apositivelight - influence answers
Demand characteristics - social desirability bias
Response bias (e.g. answering at the same favoured end of a rating scale)
Questionnaire completed to quickly by respondent who fail to read questionproperly
Acquiescencebias ("yes" saying)
Advantages of structured interviews:
Like questionnaires, are straightforward to replicate due to their standardised format
Reduces differences between interviews
Disadvantages structured interviews:
It's not possible for interviewers to deviate from the topic or explain their questions and this will limit the richness of the data collected as well as limitunexpected information
Advantages of unstructured interviews:
More flexibility
The interviewer can followup points as they arise and is much morelikely to gaininsight into the worldview of the interviewee, including eliciting unexpected information
Disadvantages of unstructured interviews:
Lead to an increase of interviewer bias
Analysis of data is not straightforward
Researcher may have to sit through irrelevant information and drawingfirmconclusions may be difficult