cognitive distortions is a form of irrationalthinking in that a person'sperception of events is wrong but they think it is accurate.
in the context of criminal behaviours, such distortion allows an offender to deny or rationalise their behaviour.
hostile attribution bias
attribution is the "process by which an individualattempts to constructcausalexplanations for his or her behaviour and the behaviour of others," (Gudjonsson and Singh, 1988.)
an individual with a hostile attribution bias is more likely to see the benign and innocuosactions of another as hostilitydirected towards them.
an individual with a high hostile attribution bias could be inclined to become angry about what they have seen, making them morelikely to be aggressive and therefore morelikely to engage in criminalbehaviour.
minimalisation
magnification and minimalisation refer to our perception of the consequences of the situation we find ourselves in, which are either over or under-exaggerated.
these are both very commoncognitiveerrors that nearly allpeople will experience in their day-to-daylife.
it has been argued that criminals are prone to minimalistic thinking - they underplay the consequences of their actions, meaning that criminal behaviour can be engaged in with minimalguilt and other negative emotions.
levels of moral reasoning
Kohlberg'sstages of moraldevelopment produce different justifications from criminals for their crimes.
preconventional: breaking the law is justified if punishment can be avoided or if the rewards outweigh the costs.
Hollin (2002) found that most criminals are likely to be at the pre-conventional level, so offenders are characteristicallylessmature in moralreasoning than non-offenders.
conventional: breaking the law is justified if it helps to maintainrelationships or society.
postconventional: breaking the law is justified if it helps to maintainhuman rights or furthersocial justice.