What is a strength for Media Influences on Aggression?
Explaining Research Findings
Anderson et al (2017) presented social learning theory as a ‘convincing theoretical framework’, and they note that it is widely accepted that exposure to violence is harmful
Children are more likely to imitateaggressive behaviours when they see them being rewarded, and even more so when children identify with on-screen characters
This is a key feature of science; having a unifying explanation to account for findings, enhancing the validity of this research
What is a strength for Media Influences on Aggression?
Meta-Analysis
Anderson et al (2010) conducted a meta-analysis of 136 studies defining aggression in different ways
The researchers found that exposure to violentcomputergames was associated with increases in all outcome measures of aggression for both men and women
Therefore, meta-analyses that include various definitions of aggression are a valid method for uncovering the effects of media on aggression
What is a limitation for Media Influences on Aggression?
Defining Aggression
Aggression is defined in multiple ways, as for example the dependent variable can be described as volume of white noise blasted in Bartholow & Anderson (2002), or as criminal convictions in Robertson et al (2013)
However, not all aggression is violence, and not all aggression or violence is necessarily criminal; the effects found in the studies depend on how aggression is defined
This variation in definitions means that the findings of the studies are hard to compare
What is a limitation for Media Influences on Aggression?
Unsupported Conclusions
Many research studies are methodologically weak, and even meta-analyses are not perfect on the basis of ‘Garbage In Garbage Out’
Many studies being correlational, so cause-and-effect conclusions are unjustified, as well as experimental studies lack external validity, so findings can not be generalised to the real world
Therefore some researchers may be guilty of drawing premature conclusions based on findings that lack validity