A feature of Eysenck's theory of crime where someone who scores highly on extraversion, neuroticism and psychoticism cannot be easily conditioned, are cold and are likely to engage in offending behaviour
Personality Theory
Eysenck proposed that behaviour could be represented along two dimensions: introversion-extraversion and neuroticism-stability
Eysenck then later added a thirddimension: psychoticism-sociability
Biological Basis of Criminality
Eysenck believed that personality traits are biological in origin and stem from the nervous system
There are 3 main personality types:
Extraversion
Neuroticism
Psychoticism
Extraversion
Underactive nervous system so they constantly seek excitement, stimulation and are likely to engage in risk taking behaviour
Tend not to condition easily and do not learn from mistakes
Seek more arousal and engage in dangerous activities
Neuroticism
High level of reactivity in the sympathetic nervous system
Respond to situations of threat really well
Tend to be nervous, overanxious and jumpy
General instability means their behaviour is unpredictable
Psychoticism
Higher levels of aggression
Unemotional and lackempathy
Lack a conscience and self control
The role of socialisation
Eysenck saw offending behaviour as developmentally immature as it is selfish and concerned with instant gratification
Process of socialisation is that children are taught to delay gratification
Eysenck believed that people with high N and E scores had nervous systems that made them difficult to condition so display more anti social behaviour
Measuring criminal personality
The Eysenck Personality Questionnaire was developed
One dimension is a scale for extraversion and introversion
Another dimension is neuroticism and stability
The third dimension is psychoticism and sociability
Eysenck's Theory: Research Support
2070 male prisoners scores on the EPQ were compared with 2422 male controls
One measures of extraversion, neuroticism and psychoticism across all age groups that were sampled, prisoners had higher average scores
Eysenck's Theory: Insufficient evidence
Meta analysis of relevant studies reported that offenders tended to score high on psychoticism but not for extraversion or neuroticism
There is also inconsistent evidence of differences on EEG measures between extraverts and introverts
This casts doubt on Eysenck's theory that states extraverts have a lack of arousal and turn to risk taking behaviour
Eysenck's Theory: Cultural factors
The criminal personality may vary according to culture
Hispanic and African American male offenders were studied
Used personality tests and compared with non criminal control group
The offenders were less extravert than the control group
The offenders were less outgoing which goes against Eysenck that may not have considered different cultures displaying different behaviours
Questions how far it can be generalised
Eysenck Theory: Biologically deterministic
Suggests your personality traits can lead you to being more inclined to criminal behaviour
This can lead to issues in the criminal justice system
Some people may not take responsibility for their actions and blame their biology
In the criminal justice system everyone has free will
Eysenck's Theory: Too simplistic
A limitation is that all offending behaviour is being limited to personality traits
There is a difference between offending behaviour that occurs in adolescence and behaviour that carries on into adulthood
Personality traits alone are a poor indicator for how long criminal behaviour goes on for