Interactionism labelling theory

Cards (34)

  • What do labelling theorists believe about deviance?
    Deviance is a social construct, not inherent.
  • Who argued that social groups create deviance?
    Becker (1963)
  • How does an act or person become deviant according to labelling theory?
    When labelled by others as deviant.
  • What do labelling theorists argue about social control agencies?
    They label certain groups as criminal.
  • What did Piliavin & Briar (1964) find about police arrests?
    Based on stereotypes of manner and dress.
  • What are typifications according to Cicourel (1976)?
    Stereotypes of the 'typical delinquent.'
  • How do working-class and ethnic minority juveniles relate to typifications?
    They are more likely to be arrested.
  • What happens to middle-class juveniles regarding typifications?
    They are less likely to fit the typification.
  • Why do crime statistics not provide a valid picture of crime patterns?
    Working-class people fit police typifications.
  • What does Cicourel argue about crime statistics?
    They should be treated as a topic for investigation.
  • What is the 'dark figure of crime'?
    The gap between official stats and real crime rates.
  • How do sociologists gain a more accurate view of crime rates?
    Using victim surveys or self-report studies.
  • What does Lemert (1972) argue about labelling and deviance?
    It encourages individuals to become more deviant.
  • What is primary deviance?
    Deviant acts not publicly labelled.
  • What is secondary deviance?
    Results from societal reaction and labelling.
  • How does labelling affect an individual's identity?
    It can become their master status.
  • What is a self-fulfilling prophecy (SFP)?
    Living up to a label assigned by others.
  • How did Young's study illustrate the self-fulfilling prophecy?
    Hippies retreated into a deviant subculture.
  • What is the deviance amplification spiral?
    Control attempts lead to increased deviance.
  • What did Cohen's study of mods and rockers illustrate?
    Media exaggeration led to moral panic.
  • How do labelling theorists differ from functionalists regarding deviance?
    Control produces further deviance, not social control.
  • What does Douglas (1967) argue about understanding suicide?
    We must discover its meanings for the deceased.
  • Why does Douglas reject official suicide statistics?
    They are social constructs reflecting labels.
  • What qualitative methods does Douglas suggest for studying suicide?
    Analysis of suicide notes and interviews.
  • What does Atkinson (1978) focus on regarding coroners?
    How they use common-sense knowledge to construct reality.
  • How do coroners' assumptions affect suicide statistics?
    They swell the official statistics through labelling.
  • What do interactionists think about official statistics on mental illness?
    They are social constructs reflecting doctors' labels.
  • What does Lemert (1962) show about socially awkward individuals?
    They may be labelled and excluded from groups.
  • What is the master status in the context of mental illness?
    The label 'mental patient' becomes dominant.
  • What does Goffman (1961) show about total institutions?

    They can lead to a mortification of the self.
  • What are degradation rituals in total institutions?
    Practices that strip away old identities.
  • What does Goffman suggest about the process of institutionalization?
    It is not deterministic; some resist it.
  • What are the strengths of labelling theory?
    • Challenges the idea of deviant differences
    • Highlights the role of societal reaction
    • Reveals importance of stereotyping
    • Shows bias in official crime statistics
    • Emphasizes power in defining deviance
    • Illustrates self-fulfilling prophecies
  • What are the weaknesses of labelling theory?
    • Shifts blame from deviant to labelers
    • Assumes deviance requires a label
    • Fails to explain causes of deviance
    • Too deterministic regarding deviance
    • Ignores structural factors in deviance
    • Lacks focus on crime victims
    • Offers no real policy solutions