A03
Cards (4)
- Point: A strength of research on caregiver-infant interactions is the controlled laboratory filming environment.Evidence: A lab allows for controlled conditions, such as minimising distractions, while filming it ensures all behaviour is captured.Explain: In addition, inter-rater reliability can be established if behaviour is filmed as multiple observers can record the data.Link: Therefore, this suggests that research findings are reliable and valid, making them robust and trustworthy.
- Point: However, a limitation is the challenge in interpreting infant behaviour.Evidence: Young babies lack coordination and their bodies are mostly immobile, thus any movements are often subtle and difficult to interpret accurately.Explain: It's challenging to figure out the meaning behind these observed behaviours, as we cannot know for certain whether a facial expression is random or in response to the caregiver.Link: Thus, this suggests caution in drawing conclusions solely from observed behaviours without considering their context or intent.
- Point: Another limitation is the uncertainty regarding the developmental importance of observed behaviours.Evidence: Feldman (2012) notes that observed patterns like synchrony lack clear implications for child development.Explain: While observable, these behaviours may not necessarily be crucial for child development as it does not tell us about the purpose of these behaviours.Link: Therefore, this suggests a need for complementary research to understand the true significance of observed behaviours in caregiver-infant interactions.
- Point: However, evidence from other research does support the importance of early interactions.Evidence: Isabella (1989) found a link between interactional synchrony and attachment quality.Explain: This suggests that caregiver-infant interactions likely play a significant role in child development.Link: Thus, this supports the notion that despite limitations, caregiver-infant interactions are indeed important for child development.