Lorenz took gosling eggs and put them separately into 2 groups.
One group was left with their biological mother and the other in an artificial incubator.
Lorenz was able to make sure that the goslings saw him and followed him around.
He put the 2 groups back together .
What was the findings of Lorenz?
The goslings had imprinted on him despite not having their actual mother present.
Lorenz’s goslings did not recognise their natural goose mother.
Lorenz came up with the theory that it is limited to a critical period in which if the goslings do not imprint in two days' time, then they will not form an attachment.
This can have an impact on mating preferences, which is called sexual imprinting.
These animals will then mate with the same kind of object they were imprinted with.
What was the conclusion of Lorenz?
The study supports imprinting and that there is a critical period in which it occurs.
What was a criticism of the study regarding the simplicity of animals?
Animal studies cannot generalise to humans as humans are capable of complex thought processes.
Human behaviour think consciously.
Humans have a much more helpless and incomplete brain compared to birds who have a more mature brain.
The bonding and growing takes much longer in humans.
Animal studies can be a helpful pointer but human studies should be replicated
What is supporting evidence for the study?
Guiton et al (1966)
Leghorn chickens were fed by yellow rubber gloves for the first few weeks and they were imprinted on them as well.
This shows that young animals imprint on any moving object present during the critical period.
The chicks also tried to reproduce with the gloves
This shows a link between imprinting and reproductive behaviour.
What else did Guiton find in his study?
Imprinting was originally seen as rigid but new research contradicts it as being quite flexible.
Guiton did another study where he reversed imprinting on the same chickens he used the yellow rubber gloves with.
The chickens spent time with non-exposed chickens
They engaged in normal sexual behaviour.
Lorenz’s behaviour is simplistic to take into account later learning.