the stages that people go through when a relationship is not working
dissatisfaction leads to four main stages that will change the perception of the relationship for the worse
intra-psychic
dyadic
social
grave dressing
Intra-psychic phase
"I can't stand this anymore"
the private thoughts that we have about the relationship
some may end the relationship here without discussion and start thinking about alternatives
begin to make plans for the future
2. Dyadic phase
"I would be justified in withdrawing"
interpersonal processes- the confrontation/discussion about the dissatisfaction
the relationship can be solved here if there is motivation to do so
self disclosure gets deeper
3. Socialphase
"I mean it"
the issues are now aired to other people such as trusted family and friends
some may take sides
some offer advice that will be helpful
some may speed up the process
4. Grave dressing
"It is now inevitable"
change other people's perception of the relationship and take sides
partners strive to present themselves as more favourable to keep their social credit intact
A03- Duck (2005)
The 1982 model presented was shown to be incomplete.
fails to take into account the relational growth following a relationship breakdown
In 2005, Duck added a new phase - "resurrectionprocess" - which essentially focuses on enabling people to move beyond their distress and instead engage in personal growth
attention will be turned to future relationships by using experiences gained from the one that just ended
A03- Real world application
shows the importance of communication in the breakdown
repair strategies can be implemented in the dyadic phase
e.g. using a mutual and an impartial friend
A03- Culture
Some relationships in non western and collectivist cultures are harder to end as the wider family is involved.
The model is hard to use for other cultures and therefore lacks generalisability.
A03- limited evidence
hard to study early stages of r.s. as it could make things worse
limited evidence of Duck's model in early stages
research tends to be retrospective rather than based on what is happening at the time