raw info from the SR is encoded into a form that the STM can deal with more easily
prefers acoustic coding
Baddeley
75Ps presented lists of 10 short words that were repeated four times
some were acoustically similar
Ps given a list containing the original words in the wrong order and their task was to rearrange the words into the correct order
10% recall for acousticallysimilar compared to 60-80% for other lists
BUT this only researches acoustic encoding
Duration
limited- up to about 30 seconds
Peterson and Peterson
presented 24 undergraduate students with consonant trigrams
during the time before recall, Ps had to count backwards in 3s to prevent rehearsal
after 3 seconds the recall rate was 90% and after 18 seconds only 5%
there is little research into the duration of other forms, such as visual
Capacity
limited to about 5-9 items
Jacobs (1887)
digit span method- Ps presented with increasingly long lists of numbers or letters that had to be recalled in order
numbers - 9 items recalled
letters - 7 items recalled
Miller (1956)
built on Jacobs' research
found that the "chunk" was the basic unit of STM
5-9 chunks can be held in STM at any one time
A03 for these studies
-all use lab experiments and can be criticised for a lack of mundane realism due to the way that they tested memory
Reasons for forgetting in STM
capacity + displacement theory
suggests that sometimes new information pushes out old information due to the limited number of slots in the memory
duration
linked to trace decay
the idea that information will fade away over time
it is hard to fully operationalise trace decay in research as new information will always enter the mind in between learning and recall so forgetting in STM can also be explained by interference