Cards (6)

  • What are the strengths of the psychodynamic approach?
    1. Explanatory power
  • What are the limitations of the psychodynamic approach?
    1. Gender-biased
    2. Untestable concepts
    3. Case study method
  • Strength = explanatory power
    • Used to explain a wide range of phenomena such as personality development, abnormal behaviour and is significant in drawing attention to connection between experiences in childhood and later development
    • e.g. studies on attachment in childhood have been shown to influence relationships in adulthood
    • Gerard McCarthy (1999) found type of attachment of adult woman had when they were children had impacted their relationships as an adult
  • Limitation = gender bias
    • Freud's views of women and female sexuality are less well developed than views on male sexuality and so he remained ignorant of female sexuality and how it may differ from male
    • Karen Horney criticised Freud's views on women and their development
    • She targeted the concept of penis envy and the fact that Freud had framed the personality development of girls in terms of men
    • Put forward theory of 'womb envy' - men secretly harboured feelings of inferiority at their inability to nurture and produce human life
  • Limitation = untestable concepts
    • Karl Popper - psychodynamic approach does not meet scientific criterion of falsification (it is not open to empirical testing)
    • Many of Freud's concepts are said to occur at unconscious level, making them difficult if not impossible to test as they are not directly observable
    • This means there is little objective evidence to support the approach
  • Limitation = case study method
    • Freud's theory based on the intensive study of single individuals who were often in therapy
    • It is not possible to make such universal claims about human nature based on the studies of such a small number of individuals who were psychologically abnormal
    • Freud's interpretation is highly subjective
    • e.g. Little Hans - highly unlikely that another researcher would have drawn the same conclusions