people with phobias do often recall a specificincident where their phobia appeared
AdDeJonghetal. (2006) found that 73% of people with fear of dentaltreatment had experienced a traumaticevent, mostly involvingdentistry, compared to a controlgroup of people with lowdentalanxiety where only21% had experienced a traumaticevent
Strength = practical applications
behaviouralexplanation has been used to developeffectivetreatments for phobias - systematic desensitisation and flooding
thesetreatmentmethods have proved very practical in realworld to helppeopledeal with phobias and overcome their fears
foundation of the treatmentunderstandingbased on researchassociated with the behaviouralapproach
Limitation = ignores biological factors
if neutral stimulusbecomesassociated with a fearful experience the resultshould be a phobia, but isn’talways
research found not everyone who is bitten by a dogdevelops a phobia of dogs
the diathesis-stress model could explainthis - suggests we inherit a genetic vulnerability for developingmental disorders but disorderonlymanifestsitself if triggered by a life event (dogbite would onlylead to phobia in those with geneticvulnerability)
thereforebehaviouralapproach is incomplete on its own as doesn’t take into accountbiological factors
Limitation = ignores cognitive factors
cognitiveaspects to phobias that cannot be explained in traditionallybehaviouristframework
alternativeexplanation is cognitive approach, which proposes that phobiasmaydevelop as consequence of irrational thinking
e.g. person in a liftmaythink ‘I could becometrapped in here and suffocate’ (irrational thought) = createsextremeanxiety and triggersphobia
two-process modelexplainsavoidancebehaviour but doesn’t offeradequateexplanation for phobiccognitions
What are the strengths of the behavioural approach to explaining phobias?
Goodexplanatory power
Practicalapplications
What are the limitations of the behavioural approach to explaining phobias?