Social Learning Theory

    Cards (19)

    • What is Direct Learning?
      • Bandura proposed that aggressive acts are learned directly through operant conditioning (Positive/Negative reinforcement and punishment)
      • E.g. if a child angrily snatches a toy off another a child and gets away with it then the child could learn this aggressive behaviour direct positive reinforcement. The aggressive behaviour brings rewards
      • However if a child is punished for snatching the toy then this could put them off performing such an aggressive act in the future
    • What is Indirect learning?
      • Most aggression is learned indirectly through observation and vicarious reinforcement
      • Observational learning explains most aggressive behaviour
      • A child observes models being aggressive and works out how aggressive behaviour is performed
      • Children also observe the consequences of a model's aggressive behaviour - if it is rewarded the child learns aggression can be effective in getting what they want. This is Vicarious Reinforcement
      • If there is negative consequences for the model then the behaviour is vicariously punished
    • What is the role of Cognitive Factors in SLT?
      • Strict behaviourists would argue that learning simply occurs through stimulus-response mechanisms
      • In classical conditioning, for example, two stimuli may become associated with a response
      • The point is that this process is automatic
      • SLT differs because cognitive aspects are important too
    • What are the four Cognitive Conditions required for SLT (Mediational Processes)
      • Attention
      • Retention
      • Reproduction
      • Motivation
    • What is Attention?

      The observer notices model's aggressive actions
    • What is Retention?
      Observer remembers model's aggressive behaviour and forms symbolic mental representation of it
    • What is Reproduction?
      Observer repeats behaviour
    • What is Motivation?
      Observer imitates the behaviour if they have an expectation that behaving aggressively will be rewarding
    • What is Self-Efficacy?

      • Self-Efficacy means how confident we are that our actions will achieve a particular goal
      • Every time a child is successful in using aggression to gain rewards their self-efficacy grows
      • A child who hits other children to get hold of a toy will become more and more confident that this action brings results every time they're successful
      • They learn that they have the motor skills to do this and that it comes easy to them
      • Increased self-efficacy reinforces the behaviour
    • Describe the Procedure of Bandura's Bobo Doll study:
      • Controlled lab experiment. Young children individually observed an adult model playing with toys including a Bobo doll.
      • Some children observed the model behaving aggressively towards the doll
      • There was a short period in which the children were not allowed to play with toys (creating frustration)
      • They were then taken to another room where there was a Bobo doll and other toys including ones the model had used
    • Describe the findings of Bandura's Bobo Doll Study:
      • Without being instructed to do so, many of the children in the aggressive model condition imitated the behaviour they observed - the closeness of the imitation was often a direct copy including using specific objects and verbal phrases
      • Children in the non-aggressive model condition showed almost no aggression
    • Limitations of Bandura's study:
      • Demand characteristics - Children may have guessed what was expected of them and the fact that Bobo dolls are designed to be hit
      • Low external validity - Artificial task and a lab experiment
      • Ignores biological differences - Boys were always the more aggressive ones compared to the girls
    • Strength of the SLT approach to explaining aggression:
      • Evidence from real-life friendship groups
      • Poulin and Boivin
      • Found most aggressive boys formed friendship groups with other aggressive boys
      • These 'cliques' became training grounds for antisocial behaviour - These groups were mutually reinforcing aggression
      • Alliances were used with each other to gain resources through aggressive behaviours
      • They were exposed to regularly to models of physical aggression
      • They also gained reinforcement from the rewarding approval from the rest of the gang
    • Strength of the SLT approach to explaining aggression:
      • Supporting Research
      • Philips - Boxing
      • Found that homicide rates in the USA nearly always went up the day after a major boxing match
      • This suggests that the general public's behaviour has been influenced by what they saw on TV
      • They are imitation the aggression that was rewarding the boxers
      HOWEVER
      This evidence is only correlational so we can't establish causation
    • Limitation of SLT as an explanation of aggression:
      • SLT can't explain all aggression
      • Bandura's work provides a good explanation for proactive aggression (cold blooded)
      • However many children display reactive aggression. They habitually use aggression in the heat of the moment to retaliate against others
      • These children tend to be hostile, suspicious of others and do not show aggression for anything else but retribution
      • SLT can't explain this
    • Limitation of SLT as an explanation of Aggression:
      • Can't explain cultural differences
      • Different cultures have different norms about which behaviours should be reinforced
      • The Kung San of the Kalahari Desert do not encourage aggression, therefore aggressive role models are unavailable for children and therefore observing vicarious reinforcement which is required fo for SLT
    • Ethical Issues of SLT and aggression:
      • Exposing children to aggressive behaviour with knowledge that they may reproduce it raises ethical concerns
      • This experiment would not be allowed these days
      • Hence we can no longer test SLT using this method
    • Nature Vs Nurture in SLT and aggression:
      • Suggests that nurture is the only thing involved in aggressive behaviour
      • So it is ignoring the role of biology
      • So SLT could be oversimplistic
    • Real Life Applications of SLT and Aggression:
      • Watershed and ratings
      • Violence can influence the types of media that children are allowed to be exposed to
      • SLT has has an impact in protecting children around the world