Bandura proposed that aggressive acts are learned directly through operant conditioning (Positive/Negativereinforcement and punishment)
E.g. if a child angrily snatches a toy off another a child and gets away with it then the child could learn this aggressive behaviour directpositivereinforcement. The aggressive behaviour brings rewards
However if a child is punished for snatching the toy then this could put them off performing such an aggressive act in the future
What is Indirect learning?
Most aggression is learned indirectly through observation and vicarious reinforcement
Observational learning explains most aggressive behaviour
A child observes models being aggressive and works out how aggressive behaviour is performed
Children also observe the consequences of a model's aggressive behaviour - if it is rewarded the child learns aggression can be effective in getting what they want. This is Vicarious Reinforcement
If there is negative consequences for the model then the behaviour is vicariously punished
What is the role of Cognitive Factors in SLT?
Strict behaviourists would argue that learning simply occurs through stimulus-response mechanisms
In classical conditioning, for example, two stimuli may become associated with a response
The point is that this process is automatic
SLT differs because cognitive aspects are important too
What are the four Cognitive Conditions required for SLT (Mediational Processes)
Attention
Retention
Reproduction
Motivation
What is Attention?
The observer notices model's aggressive actions
What is Retention?
Observer remembers model's aggressive behaviour and forms symbolic mental representation of it
What is Reproduction?
Observer repeats behaviour
What is Motivation?
Observer imitates the behaviour if they have an expectation that behaving aggressively will be rewarding
What is Self-Efficacy?
Self-Efficacy means how confident we are that our actions will achieve a particular goal
Every time a child is successful in using aggression to gain rewards their self-efficacy grows
A child who hits other children to get hold of a toy will become more and more confident that this action brings results every time they're successful
They learn that they have the motor skills to do this and that it comes easy to them
Increased self-efficacy reinforces the behaviour
Describe the Procedure of Bandura's Bobo Doll study:
Controlledlab experiment. Young children individually observed an adult model playing with toys including a Bobo doll.
Some children observed the model behaving aggressively towards the doll
There was a short period in which the children were not allowed to play with toys (creating frustration)
They were then taken to another room where there was a Bobo doll and other toys including ones the model had used
Describe the findings of Bandura's Bobo Doll Study:
Without being instructed to do so, many of the children in the aggressive model condition imitated the behaviour they observed - the closeness of the imitation was often a direct copy including using specific objects and verbal phrases
Children in the non-aggressive model condition showed almost no aggression
Limitations of Bandura's study:
Demand characteristics - Children may have guessed what was expected of them and the fact that Bobo dolls are designed to be hit
Low external validity - Artificial task and a lab experiment
Ignores biologicaldifferences - Boys were always the more aggressive ones compared to the girls
Strength of the SLT approach to explaining aggression:
Evidence from real-life friendship groups
Poulin and Boivin
Found most aggressive boys formed friendship groups with other aggressive boys
These 'cliques' became training grounds for antisocial behaviour - These groups were mutually reinforcing aggression
Alliances were used with each other to gain resources through aggressive behaviours
They were exposed to regularly to models of physical aggression
They also gained reinforcement from the rewardingapproval from the rest of the gang
Strength of the SLT approach to explaining aggression:
Supporting Research
Philips - Boxing
Found that homicide rates in the USA nearly always went up the day after a major boxing match
This suggests that the general public's behaviour has been influenced by what they saw on TV
They are imitation the aggression that was rewarding the boxers
HOWEVER
This evidence is only correlational so we can't establish causation
Limitation of SLT as an explanation of aggression:
SLT can't explain all aggression
Bandura's work provides a good explanation for proactive aggression (cold blooded)
However many children display reactive aggression. They habitually use aggression in the heat of the moment to retaliate against others
These children tend to be hostile, suspicious of others and do not show aggression for anything else but retribution
SLT can't explain this
Limitation of SLT as an explanation of Aggression:
Can't explain cultural differences
Different cultures have different norms about which behaviours should be reinforced
The Kung San of the Kalahari Desert do not encourage aggression, therefore aggressive role models are unavailable for children and therefore observing vicarious reinforcement which is required fo for SLT
Ethical Issues of SLT and aggression:
Exposing children to aggressive behaviour with knowledge that they may reproduce it raises ethical concerns
This experiment would not be allowed these days
Hence we can no longer test SLT using this method
Nature Vs Nurture in SLT and aggression:
Suggests that nurture is the only thing involved in aggressive behaviour
So it is ignoring the role of biology
So SLT could be oversimplistic
Real Life Applications of SLT and Aggression:
Watershed and ratings
Violence can influence the types of media that children are allowed to be exposed to
SLT has has an impact in protecting children around the world