suggests that forgetting occurs because one memory disrupts another which causes one or both memories to become distorted or forgotten
proactive interference is when old memories disrupt the recall of new memories , for e.g. an old phone number disrupts an attempt to recall a new phone number
retroactive interference is when new memories disrupt the recall of older memories, for e.g. when a new car resgistration prevents the recall of a previous one
Research into interference theory
Ps learn two lists of word pairs where the first word of each pair is the same in both lists
after the lists are memories, Ps are given the first word and are asked to recall the paired word from either list one or list two
if Ps struggle to recall from list 1 then it is retroactive interference
if they struggle to recall from list 2 then it is proactive interference
AO3
lab experiments lacks mundane realism and does not relate in real life situations
using artificial tasks makes interference more likely that in real life
Baddeley and Hitch
real life test to measure interferency
rugby players were asked to recall the names of teams they had played earlier in the season
some players missed certain games, leaving a measure of forgetting due to decay as opposed to interference from intervening games
the results showed that time was not a good predictor of forgetting
forgetting increased with the number of intervening games
they concluded that forgetting was due to interference rather than trace decay
Limitation of Interference Theory
only really explains forgetting when two sets of information are similar
this doesnt occur very often and so it cannot explain the idea of forgetting in real life settings
Alternative explanations
more research for cue dependent forgetting and trace decay