Behaviours that describe each of the organised and disorganised types are not mutually exclusive
Ex. it is possible that an offender is a killer with high intelligence and sexual competence who commits a spontaneous murder and leaves the body at the crime seen
Therefore it is difficult to categorise some offenders as one type or another
This suggests that the distinction between the types is an oversimplification and so has questionable validity
TD Approach AO3 - Limited Approach
Best suited to crimes that reveal important details about the suspect such as rape, arson and cult killings, as well as crimes that involve practices such as sadistic torture, dissection of the body or acting our fantasies
More common offences such as burglary and destruction of property do not lend themselves to profiling because the resulting crime reveals very little about the offender
Means that it is at best a limited approach to identifying a criminal as it only applies to particular crimes
TD Approach AO3 - Wider Application
Has been adapted to other crimes like burglary
Meketa reports that top-down profiling has been recently applied to burglary, leading to an 85% rise in solved cases in three US States
This has been done by retaining the organised-disorganised distinction but also adding two new categories: interpersonal (offender usually knows the victim and steals something of significance) and opportunistic (generally inexperienced young offender)
Suggests approach has wider application than was originally assumed
What is the bottom-up approach in criminal profiling?