Tihonen et al - those with the defective genes were 13 times more likely to have a history of repeated violent behaviour, but not everyone with the gene had become an offender
The law asks the question about whether the cause of behaviour is outside a person's control, and it does appear harder for some men to avoid criminal violence - may be due to both biology and the environment in which they grew up
Therefore a determinist view of criminal behaviour cannot be totally ruled out
G+N Explanations AO3 - Brain evidence
Kandel and Freed - reviewed evidence of frontal lobe damage and antisocial behaviour
People with such damage tended to show impulsive behaviour, emotional instability and inability to learn from their mistakes
Frontal lobe is associated with planning behaviour
Supports the idea that brain damage may be a causal factor in offending behaviour
G+N Explanations AO3 - Reductionist
Ignores the complexity of behaviour and the influence of other factors
To say socialisation and upbringing cannot change or affect an individual is unlikely and to ignore this as a potential factors is missing key information in the understanding of criminal behaviour
Ex. there have been examples of individuals with the MAOA gene who have not developed violent or anti-social tendencies
Therefore a more diathesis stress explanation appears more likely for criminality
What neurotransmitter is linked to pleasure and reward?