features of science + reporting psychological investigation

    Cards (7)

    • paradigms:
      • shared set of assumptions + methods - separates scientific + no scientific disciplines
      • social sciences lack universally accepted paradigm, distinct from natural sciences - number of principles at core
      • psych has many internal disagreements with too many conflicting approaches
    • paradigm shifts:
      • progress with established science occurs when theres a scientific revolution
      • researchers question accepted paradigm shift, critique gathers popularity - shift occurs when theres too much contradictory research
    • theory construction + hypothesis testing:
      • theory - set of general laws/principles - can explain behaviour/events
      • theory construction - gathering via observation, should be possible to make clear/precise predictions on basis of theory (hypothesis testing)
      • hypothesis tested using systematic/objective methods
    • falsifiability:
      • find evidence that hypothesis is true + none that counters it, pseudosciences cant be falsified
      • theories that survive most attempts to falsify = strongest
      • this is why alternative hypothesis is accompanied by null
    • replicability:
      • extent to which scientific procedures + findings can be replaced by others - important to determine validity/reliability of findings
      • repeat study in different contexts/circumstances - see extent to which findings can be generalised
      • vital that researchers report investigations with precision + rigor so others can seek to verify
    • objectivity + empirical method:
      • cant let personal bias discolour data or influence behaviour - greatest levels of control are more objective e.g lab studies
      • empirical - based on gathering evidence through direct observation + experience
      • theory cant be scientific unless empirically tested + verified
    • reporting psychological investigations:
      • abstract - sumarises all major elements
      • intro - literature review of investigation (aim + hypothesis)
      • method - design, sample, materials, procedure
      • results - descriptive stats
      • discussion - verbal summary of results
      • references - name, year, book, chapter, year