Proposed that people's decisions and judgements on morality can be summarised in a stage of moral development. Criminals tend to show low levels of moral reasoning.
Kohlberg based his theories of moral dilemmas like the Heinz problem. A woman is dying and needs an expensive medication. Husband cannot afford the medication, should he steal it or should she die?
Using the moral dilemma technique, Kohlberg found that a group of violent youths was lower in moral development than in non-violent youths. He controlled their social background.
Commit crime if they can avoid punishment with it or gain rewards (immature/child-like reasoning) supported by studies suggesting offenders often more egocentric and display poor social skills.
Presented 55 violent offenders with emotionally ambiguous facial expressions. Compared to control group and violent offenders were more likely to see anger and hostility. Roots of this behaviour may lie in childhood.
Children were shown an "ambiguous provocation" where the intention was neither clearly hostile or accidental. Prior to the study, children who had been judged as aggressive were more likely to perceive the situation as hostile.