sebastian + hernandez gill - cognitive

Cards (22)

  • aims of experiment (3)
    1 - to study development of phonological loop in children aged 5-17
    2 - to see whether digit span increased with age in the same way it did with english native speakers
    3 - to compare digit span of this age group with previous research with adults, the aged, and dementia patients
  • what had previous research shown (3)
    1 - phonological loop present by age 3-4
    2 - subvocal rehearsal present from age 7-8
    3 - anglo-saxon digit span increased to 15 years old
  • who were the participants, how many
    570 volunteers, native Spanish children from schools in Madrid aged 5-17
  • procedure
    1 - participants split into age groups
    2 - sequences of digits read out to them at a rate of 1 digit per second, list length increased by 1 digit per sequence
    3 - participants had to recall the digits in sequential order
    4 - digit span recorded as maximum number of digits in a sequence recalled without error
  • control variables
    . ability of children - reading, writing, hearing, language, ect
    . rate of digit presentation
    . standardised procedure
  • who was excluded from the experiment
    children with impairments
  • what was the experimental design
    independent groups
  • independent variable
    age
  • dependent variable
    recall of digits in sequential order
  • results (2)
    1 - digit span slowly rises until around age 11, then continues to rise slowly until adulthood
    2 - overall digit span lower in spanish population compared to english - possibly due to pronunciation time due to more syllables in spanish numbers
  • conclusions
    . subvocal rehearsal appears at 7-8 years old - means pronunciation time then becomes a significant factor in digit span
  • how was the conclusion found
    there was no difference in digit span between spanish and english speakers until age of 7, then a noticeable difference at 9
  • how were results compared to previous research
    . the aged previously found to have similar digit span to those with advances dementia
    . suggests that poor digit span in dementia patients is a consequence of aging , not dementia
    . the aged has a higher digit span than 5 year olds in this study
  • generalisation pros (2)

    . large sample (570), male and female so no gender bias = more representative
    . sample of spanish participants made comparison with english possible
  • generalisation cons (4)

    . participants volunteered so could have ulterior motive for participating
    . participants from Madrid schools only = children not representative of other regions
    . can't generalise findings to other language and cultures
    . participants with impairments excluded so is impossible to generalise findings to that group
  • reliability
    . standardised procedure used eg presentation of digits 1 per second = good internal reliability
    . is possible to replicate so external reliability of findings can be measured
  • application (2)

    . use of measures of digit span to detect dyslexia
    . limited digit span of younger children may be important for teachers of primary school aged children
  • validity pros

    . possible confounding variables controlled making it easier to infer cause and effect relationship between age + digit span = good internal validity
  • validity cons

    . lack of ecological validity - recalling digits is not an everyday task
  • validity conclusion
    further research needed to investigate more everyday learning
  • ethics
    . participants were children so unable to give informed consent
    . protection - children could be upset with a lower than average score
  • ethics conclusion
    . benefits of the research in terms of scientific benefits and applications outweigh the relatively low ethical cost