Eysenck and Eysenck compared 2070 male prisoners on the EPI with 2422 male controls
On measures of psychoticism, extraversion and neuroticism, prisoners recorded higher scores than controls
This support the predictions of the theory that criminals have higher scores on measures of the criminal personality, suggesting that the theory has some validity
Eysenck's Theory AO3 - Conflicting evidence
Farrington et al. - reviewed several studies and reported that offenders tended to score high on P measures, but not for E and N
There is also very little evidence of consistent differences in EEG measures between extraverts and introverts, which casts doubt on the biological basis of Eysenck’s theory
This suggests that the link between personality traits and criminal behaviour is unclear
Implies that extraversion and neuroticism may not be typical characteristics of many criminals and therefore the theory may not be externally valid
Eysenck's Theory AO3 - Over-simplistic
Idea that all offending behaviour can be explained by a single personality type has been heavily criticised
Ex. Digman’s Five Factor Model of personality suggests that alongside extraversion and neuroticism there are additional dimensions of openness, agreeableness and conscientiousness
From this perspective multiple combinations are available and therefore a high extraversion and neuroticism score does not mean offending is inevitable