SocialLearningTheory does take into account cognition in the process of learning genderroles. There is an element of free will in the genderroles that are selected.
Smith & Lloyd (1978) offer support for the Social Learning Theory(SLT). They suggest that genderappropriate behaviour is secured at an early age through differential reinforcement.
Differentialreinforcement is the way in which boys and girls are encouraged to show distinct gender appropriate behaviours.
Smith & Lloyd (1978) observed how people responded to babies dependent on what clothes they were wearing. If babies were dressed as girls, they were more likely to be told they were pretty and be handed a doll to play with.
Like the psychodynamicexplanation, the SocialLearningTheory (SLT) makes reference to the importance of identification in genderdevelopment
The Social Learning Theory (SLT) fails to account for biological influences on genderrole behaviour.
In some social observations boys are encouraged to be more active during play, but this may be a consequence of the fact that they are naturally more active due to hormonaldifferences. It may not be the result of differentialreinforcement.
The SocialLearningTheory (SLT) can explain cultural changes in stereotypical gender appropriate behaviour. For example, it is acceptable today for children to display androgynous characteristics.
The SocialLearningTheory (SLT) has difficulty explaining how children's understanding of gender changes over time.
It is believed that cognitiveprocesses play a greater role in the learning of gender than the sociallearning theory allows. However, Bandura (1977) did account for this in his ARRM theory.
Some aspects of genderrole behaviour appear to be universal for all cultures, however these socialnorms are subject to change over time.
Universal features of genderdevelopment often accommodate for innate influences in genderroles. For example, more females take on nurturinggenderroles, which could be the result of biological influences.
The SocialLearningTheory (SLT) does not provide an adequate explanation of how learningprocesses change with age.