A test is valid when is measures what it claims to be measurin
Two ways of assessing validity
.Face validity
.Concurrent validity
.predictive validity
Face Validity
whether As test appears to measure what it claims to
Concurrent validity
Comparing a results to a previous test by another test of the same behaviour that is valid to see if the first test has ‘concurrent validity’. Of correlation between the two tests results is over 0.8+ it has high concurrent validity
Internal validity
.whether researcher measured what they intended to measure.
External validity
Whether findings can be Generalised beyond study and researcher settings
internal validity- within tests
.social desirability- participants hide their genuine opinions/behaviours to look good and be more socially acceptable
Demand characteristics-participants who has discovered the aim and try support results
.investigator effects-researcher bias where the researcher un/consciously influences results
.uncontrolled extraneous variables-lack of controls ;not using standardised procedures not controlling participant variables by randomly assigning to groups
External validity- outside tests
Ecological validity-can be generalised to alternative enviorment( test of obedience from lab studies to a busy street ,could obedience be replicated)
.population validity- sample of a study is representative of target population (gender ,ages ,ethnicity)
.temporal validity- findings can be generalised to other time periods .tipics like social influence ,attachments ,relationships would be the same in modern society
predictive validity
.the extent to which the test can predict future performance/outcome and behaviour (GCSE scored are highly predictive of A-LEVEL scores)