by using only onehemisphere to engage in a particular task (e.g. language or mathematicalability), this would leave the otherhemispherefree to engage in otherfunction and thus increasingneural processingcapacity
e.g. Rogers et al (2004)- in the domestic chicken, brainlateralisation is associated with an enhancedability to performtwotaskssimultaneously-findingfood and beingvigilant for predators
related to increasedneuralcapacity COUNTER ARGUMENT
it is very hard to apply this finding in animals to humanbrains. there has been very littleevidence showing that lateralisation is advantageous to the functioning of the brain in humans
scientific methodology
the experiments involving split-brain patients made use of highlyspecialised and standardisedprocedures. there was a highdegree of control over all variables-> increasing the internal validity of the experiement
scientific methodology COUNTER ARGUMENT
many researchers have urgedcaution in the widespreadacceptance of the conclusions drawn from this split-brainresearch.split-brainpatients= an unusualsample of people
there were only 11 who took part in allvariations of the basicprocedure, all of whom had a history of epilepticseizures. this may have caused uniquechanges in the brain that may have influenced the findings -> lowering the internalvalidity of the research and making it difficult to draw generalconclusions
limitations
differences in function may be overemphasised
lateralisationchanges with age
differences in function may be overemphasised
one legacy of Sperry's work is that it tends to overemphasise and oversimplify the functionaldistinction between the left and righthemisphere
modernneuroscientists -> the actual distinction between left and righthemisphere is lessclear-cut. in the brain the twohemispheres are in communication when performing everydaytasks, and many behavioursassociated with onehemisphere can be performed by the other
e.g. patientJ.W.developed the capacity to speak out of the righthemisphere about informationpresentedeachside of the brain.
lateralisationchanges with age
lateralisation of function appears not to stay the same throughout a lifetime, but changes with normal ageing
Szaflarski et al. (2006)- language became more lateralised to the left hemisphere with increasingage in children and adolescents, but after25, lateralisation then decreased with each decade of life. across many tasks and and many brain areas, lateralisedfunctions (functions tended to be dealt with by onehemisphere) found in youngerindividuals tend to switch to bilateralfunctions (functions dealt with by bothhemispheres) in healthyolder adults