AO1

Cards (5)

  • Bowlby (1988)
    • suggests that fathers can fill a role closely resembling the mothers role but it is uncommon
    • According to Bowlby a father is more likely to engage in physically active and novel play and is the childs preferred play companion
  • Schaffer and Emerson (1964)
    • Found that majority of babies attached to the mother first at around 7 months
    • In 27% of cases it was the mother and the father and in 3% of cases it was solely the father
    • Additional attachments proceeded in the next months - 75% of cases bonds were formed with fathers by 18 months
  • Field (1978)
    • Compared the behaviours of primary caretaker mothers with primary and secondary caretaker fathers
    • Face to face interactions were analysed from video footage with infants at 4 months
    • Secondary caregiver fathers engaged more in game playing and held their infants less
    • Primary caregiver fathers engaged in significantly more smiling, imitative grimaces and imitative vocalisations which were comparable to mothers behaviour
  • Grossman et al. (2002)
    • Conducted a longitudinal study of 44 families comparing the role of fathers and mothers contribution to their children’s attachment experiences at 6, 10 and 16 years
    • Quality of an infant attachment with mother was related to children’s attachments in adolescent, fathers attachment less important
    • Therefore fathers may be less important in long term emotional development
    • Found quality of the fathers play with infants was related to the quality of adolescent attachments
    • This suggests fathers have a different role in attachment, one to do with play and stimulation
  • Brown et al. (2012)
    • investigated father involvement, paternal sensitivity and father-child attachment security at 13 months and 3 years
    • Results - involvement and sensitivity influenced father-child attachment security at age 3
    • Involvement was a greater predictor of secure attachment when fathers were rated as less sensitive
    • Suggests that the gender of a caregiver is not crucial in predicting attachment types rather than the extent of caregiver involvement