psychology core studies

    Cards (466)

    • Who was Stanley Milgram?
      He was a psychology professor at Yale University during the 1960s.
    • What was Milgram's area of interest that influenced his research?
      He was particularly interested in the Holocaust and the behavior of Nazi soldiers.
    • What did Milgram want to understand through his research?
      He wanted to understand why and how Nazi soldiers committed atrocities during the Holocaust.
    • What common defense did Nazi defendants use at the Nuremberg Trials?
      They claimed they were merely following orders from superiors.
    • What theory did Milgram propose regarding obedience?
      He theorized that the Holocaust was a result of a cascade of obedience within the Nazi hierarchy.
    • What was the aim of Milgram's experiment?
      To investigate the extent of obedience when participants were instructed to administer electric shocks.
    • What was the sample used in Milgram's study?
      It consisted of 40 male participants aged 20 to 50 from various occupations and educational backgrounds.
    • Why did Milgram exclude students from his study?
      He concluded that there was something fundamentally different about students compared to other types of people.
    • What design did Milgram's study use?
      It used an independent measures design with no control group.
    • What type of data did Milgram collect in his study?
      He collected both quantitative data (shock levels) and qualitative data (participant comments).
    • What was the initial explanation given to participants about the study?
      Participants were told it was a study about learning and memory, which was a lie.
    • What role did the Confederate play in Milgram's experiment?
      The Confederate pretended to be another participant but was actually aware of the true nature of the experiment.
    • How were roles assigned to participants in the study?
      Roles were fixed so that the participant was always the teacher and the Confederate was always the learner.
    • What did the learner mention before the experiment began?
      The learner mentioned that they had a heart condition.
    • What was the teacher's job in the experiment?
      The teacher's job was to test the learner by asking them to recall word pairs.
    • What was the purpose of the electric shock generator in the study?
      It was used to administer shocks to the learner for incorrect answers, although it was not real.
    • How did the shock generator enhance the impression of reality?
      It created realistic electrical sounds when the shock button was pressed.
    • What voltage increments were participants instructed to use when administering shocks?
      Participants were instructed to increase the shock voltage by 15-volt intervals.
    • What was the maximum voltage that participants could administer?
      The maximum voltage was 450 volts.
    • What labels were placed next to the shock intervals?
      Labels indicated the severity of the shocks, ranging from slight shock to danger severe shock.
    • What was the purpose of giving participants a real shock of 45 volts before the experiment began?
      It was intended to prove to them that the shock generator was real.
    • What happened when the participant began administering shocks?
      The participant shocked the learner every time they gave a wrong response, increasing the voltage as instructed.
    • What did the learner do when 300 volts were reached?
      The learner was heard banging on the wall and screaming in agony.
    • What did the researcher tell the participant if they refused to continue administering shocks?
      The researcher used verbal prods to encourage the participant to continue.
    • How many verbal prods did the researcher have to encourage participants to continue?
      There were four verbal prods used in sequence.
    • What happened if a participant refused to obey after the fourth prod?
      The experiment was terminated if the participant still refused to continue.
    • What was the outcome for participants who reached 450 volts?
      The study ended, and they were debriefed about the true nature of the experiment.
    • What did Milgram do after the study ended?
      He debriefed participants and arranged a friendly reconciliation with the learner.
    • What did Milgram ask 14 senior psychology majors to predict?
      He asked them to predict the outcome of the study regarding obedience levels.
    • What was the prediction made by the psychology majors about participants administering shocks?
      They predicted that only an insignificant minority would administer shocks up to 450 volts.
    • What was the actual percentage of participants who administered the maximum shock of 450 volts?
      65% of participants continued to the highest level of 450 volts.
    • What percentage of participants continued to 300 volts?
      100% of participants continued up to 300 volts.
    • How many participants refused to obey beyond 300 volts?
      Five participants refused to obey beyond 300 volts.
    • What were some comments made by participants who defied the experiment?
      Comments included expressions of discomfort and moral conflict about the shocks.
    • What physical symptoms did participants display during the experiment?
      Participants displayed symptoms like sweating, trembling, and nervous laughter.
    • What was a concerning finding regarding some participants during the study?
      Three participants experienced full-blown uncontrollable seizures during the experiment.
    • What was the main conclusion drawn from Milgram's experiment?
      Ordinary people are likely to follow orders even if it causes harm to others.
    • What sampling method was used to recruit participants for the study?
      Volunteer sampling
    • Where did the study take place?
      In a laboratory
    • What were the two main dependent variables of the study?
      Participants' obedience/disobedience and scores on personality inventories
    See similar decks