Strength (Lorenz) = additional research support for imprinting
A number of otherstudies have demonstratedimprinting in animals
Guiton (1966) found that chicksexposed to yellow rubber gloves whilst beingfedduring their firstfewweeks, becameimprinted on the gloves
He also found that the malechickenslatertried to mate with the gloves, showing that earlyimprinting is linked to laterreproductivebehaviour
Limitation (Lorenz) = criticism of imprinting
It was accepted that imprinting is an irreversibleprocess, whereby the objectencountered was somehowstampedpermanently on the nervoussystem
However, it is nowunderstood that imprinting is a more‘plastic and forgivingmechanism’
Guiton (1966) also found that he couldreverse the imprinting in chickens that had initiallytried to mate with the rubbergloves
Later, after spendingmoretime with their ownspecies, they were able to engage in morenormalsexualbehaviour with otherchickens
What is a strength of Harlow’s research?
Practical applications
What is a limitation of Harlow’s research?
Ethicalissues
Strength (Harlow) = practical applications
The insight into attachment from Harlow’s research has had important applications in a range of practicalcontexts
E.g. it has helpedsocialworkersunderstandriskfactors in childneglect and abuse and so intervene to prevent it
In addition, the findings have been important in the care of captivemonkeys - we nowunderstand the importance of properattachmentfigures for babymonkeys in zoos and also in breedingprogrammes in the wild
Limitation (Harlow) = ethical issues
Harlowfacedseverecriticisms for the ethics of his research
The babymonkeys were deliberatelydeprived from their mothers from birth and this createdlastingemotionalharm as the monkeys later found it difficult to formrelationships with theirpeers
HOWEVER - on the otherhand, the experiment can be justified in terms of the significanteffect it has had on our understanding of the processes of attachment and it has been used to offerbettercare for human (and primate) infants
What is the general limitation of animal studies?
Difficultygeneralisinganimalstudies to humans
General limitation = difficulty generalising animal studies to humans
Psychologistsdisagree on the extent to which studies of animals can be generalised to humans
Humansdiffer from animals in importantways - muchmore of our behaviour is governed by conscious decisions and so attachmentbehavioursmay be different
Althoughanimalstudies can be usefulpointers in understandinghumanbehaviour we mustalwaysseekconfirmation by looking at research with humans