leader makes decisions alone; effective in emergencies but discourages creativity
democratic leadership styles
involves team in decision-making; promotes creativity and commitment
paternalisticleadership styles
makes decisions while considering employee welfare
bureaucraticleadership styles
focuses on rules and structure; limits innovation
laissez-faireleadership styles
minimal intervention; allows team autonomy but risks low productivity
fiedlers contingency model:
leadership effectiveness depends on style (task- or relationship orientated) and situational control, identified through the least preferred co worker scale (LPC)
task-orientated leaders excel in extreme situations
relationship-orientated leaders perform best in moderate conditions
wright and taylor:
emphasized improving leadership skills through education
leaders must adapt to individual and situational needs to enhance performance
identifies reasons for underperformance: goal clarity, ability, task difficulty, intrinsic/extrinsic motivation, feedback, resources, and working conditions
encourages solutions such as job redesign, training, and improving communication
importance of leadership for businesses:
drives vision, innovation, and alignment with goals
encourages adaptability in changing markets
importance of leadership for stakeholders:
enhances employee morale and customer satisfaction
strengthens the organizations reputation
evaluation of leadership styles:
autocratic: ideal for crisis management but can lower morale
democratic: best for fostering innovation but time-intensive
laissez-faire: effective for skilled teams but risks lack of direction
contingency approach: adaptability ensures effectiveness across situations
management vs leadership
leaders focus on long-term strategy, vision, and inspiration
managers oversee day-to-day operations and ensure adherence to established principles
successful business owners often blend strong leadership and management skills
effective manager traits:
includes self awareness, which allows managers to understand their strengths and limitations
MBO process
Review corporate objectives.
Set functional objectives for management.
Define objectives for individual departments and workers.
Monitor progress regularly.
Evaluate performance and provide rewards if objectives are met.
consequences of theory x managers
Strict communication control limits innovation.
Over-reliance on senior management for decisions.
consequences of theory y managers:
Encourages cell working, where production or service processes are restructured for efficiency.
Flexible working practices often thrive under Theory Y management.