Socialisation impacts development - building of attachments in early childhood and seeing, speaking and considering others
Criminals did not learn to consider others and delay gratification
So both nature and nurture are important
Those high in extraversion and neuroticism had nervous systems that were harder to condition
Evidence supporting the criminal personality theory
Eysenck and Eysenck (1970) - Strength
Compared 2070 male and prisoners’ scores on the EPI with 2422 male controls
Groups were subdivided into age groups, ranging from 16-69
On measure of Psychoticism, Extraversion, and Neuroticism prisoners recorded higher scores than controls which accords with predictions of the theory
Evidence supporting the criminal personality theory
Farrington et al (1982)
Reviewed several studies and reported that offenders tended to score higher on Psychoticism measures but not for Extraversion and Neuroticism
There is also very little evidence of consistent differences in EEG measures (used to measure cortical arousal) between extroverts and introverts, which casts doubt on Eysenck‘s theory
Oversimplification - Weakness
The idea that all offending behaviour can be explained by a single personality type has been heavily criticised
Moffitt (1993) - proposed several distinct types of adult male offender based on the timing of the first offence, and how long offending persists
Oversimplification - Weakness
Eysenck’s criminal type is out-of-step with modern personality theories
John Digman (1990) - five factor model of personality suggests that alongside extraversion and neuroticism, there are additional dimensions of openess, agreeableness and conscientiousness
Multiple combinations are available and therefore a high extraversion and neuroticism does not mean offending is inevitable
Culture bias - weakness
Bartol and Holanchock (1979)
Hispanic and African-American offenders in a max security prison were divided into six groups based on their criminal history and the nature of their offence
It was found that all 6 groups were found to be less extroverted than a non-criminal control group
This suggested that this was because their sample was a very different cultural group than that investigated by Eysenck, which questions the generalisability of the criminal personality